1) 55.13. 2.13. 3. 1. 6 tuns 299 days to end of Katun 13 Ahau.
2) 55. 9.17.14.11. 1. 5 " 139 " " " "
3) 57. 2.14.13.16. 1. 6 " 39 " " " "
In no one of the cases is the date 9 Ymix 19 Zip exactly 6 tuns before
the end of the Katun 13 Ahau, but it is possible that the annalist took
no account of fractions of tuns, either in excess of the 6 tuns or
otherwise. Thus in the first and last cases of the three, as first
given, he may have said to himself, "There are but 6 whole tuns
remaining of the katun and I will call it 6," or in the second case he
may have said: "There are 5 tuns remaining and 139 days besides; I will
call it 6 tuns." Whichever was the plan he followed, we can have at
present no means of ascertaining except from the results which we obtain
by calculation.
The date found on Stela 9 of Copan, which is the earliest date of these
stelæ of that place, in which the numbers preceding the period glyphs
are given by the line-and-dot method, is 54.9.6.10.0.0. This precedes
the above dates by the following periods:
1) 0.3.16.3. 3.1. = 548,341 days = 1,502 years 111 days.
2) 1.0.11.4.11.1 = 1,952,861 " = 5,350 " 14 "
3) 2.6. 8.3.16.1 = 4,667,001 " = 12,786 " 111 "
If, now, we accept the first date of 55.13.2.13.3.1. as the date of
Ahpula's death, we shall have the date of Stela 9 of Copan as A.D. 34,
since the death occurred in 1536. If we accept the second date,
55.9.17.14.11.1., as the true one, Stela 9 must represent a date of B.C.
3814, and in the case of the third date, 57.2.14.13.16.1. in which the
period to elapse to the end of Katun 13 Ahau is the nearest to an exact
6 tuns, we should throw back Copan to B.C. 11,250. It is not probable,
however, that either of the last two dates is correct, both because of
the immense time which would have elapsed and because the monuments show
signs of no such age. We are therefore left to the date A.D. 34 as the
probable date of the earliest stela of Copan which we know of at
present.
The following table gives the earliest and latest dates in Copan and
Quirigua as far as we know them, together with the dates of our calendar
corresponding thereto, on the supposition that the above date is rightly
deciphered:
Copan: Stela 9, 9. 6.10.0.0 A.D. 34.
" N, 9.16.10.0.0 = 197 years later than A.D. 34 A.D. 231.
Quirigua: " C, 9. 1. 0.0.0 = 108 + " earlier " " say B.C. 75.
" K, 9.18.15.0.0 = 241 + " later " " A.D. 275.
If this is correct, Copan lasted, so far as the erection of stelæ is
concerned, for about 200 years, and Quirigua for about 350 years, though
of course this may be only a small part of the period of their
existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account