If one were left to determine from our English Bible the meaning of
this passage, it would be difficult to avoid the admission that it
gives countenance to that form of doctrine commonly known as
Calvinistic; for does it not present to us, in language sufficiently
clear and obvious, the Divine Sovereignty as shown in Electing Grace?
Must we not admit that there are those who by a Supreme Deed of Gift
are allotted to the mercies of the Son; over whom He exercises the care
of a good Shepherd; and is it not difficult to resist the conclusion
that, as there are some who are the objects of special solicitude and
care, so there are those who in some degree lie outside the sphere of
the Divine Benevolence?
Again, if we were to look at the 39th verse of this same chapter, and
read the words, "This is the Father's will which hath sent Me, that of
all which He hath given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it
up again at the last day," should we not say that the natural meaning
of the passage is that there is a Doctrine of Final Perseverance,
linked on to that of the Election of Grace, and a necessary corollary
to it?
But when we turn to the Greek, we notice that in the first of the
verses quoted the word _all_ is in the neuter gender, and so does not
necessarily apply to persons at all, and we are more likely to catch
the true meaning of the words by reading it as follows: "Everything
that the Father hath given Me shall come to Me"; and in the other
passage a similar correction must be made, as is otherwise evident from
the last part of the passage, "I will raise _it_ up at the last day";
"Of everything which the Father hath given Me I should lose nothing."
Viewed in this light, the words that were supposed to imply election
teach consecration, and instead of final perseverance we read full
possession. And this we do not say with any idea of refuting
Calvinistic doctrine, having no "isms" of our own and little time to
spend in attacking those of other people. Likely enough, our rendering
of the words may be incorrect, and in any case we ought carefully to
compare similar passages in the Gospel; but be that as it may, the
truth is not affected that the Sovereignty of God and the Love of God
demand the full subjection and surrender of our being; and we are
assured that where these conditions are fulfilled, the Divine
Possession and Protection become an intense and abiding reality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account