Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1De Quincey, Thomas
General
Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1
De Quincey, Thomas
English essays
Hence his extravagant misappraisement of Knolles, the Turkish historian,
which is exposed so severely by Spittler, the German, who, again, is
himself miserably superficial in his analysis of English history.
Hence the feeble credulity which Dr. Johnson showed with respect to
the forgery of De Foe (under the masque of Captain Carleton) upon the
Catalonian campaign of Lord Peterborough. But it is singular that a
literature, so unrivalled as ours in its compass and variety, should not
have produced any, even the shallowest, manual of itself. And thus it
happens, for example, that writers so laborious and serviceable as Birch
are in any popular sense scarcely known. I showed to Lord Massey, among
others of his works, that which relates to Lord Worcester's (that is,
Lord Glamorgan's) negotiations with the Papal nuncio in Ireland, about
the year 1644, &c. Connected with these negotiations were many names
amongst Lord Massey's own ancestors; so that here he suddenly alighted
upon a fund of archæologic memorabilia, connecting what interested him
as an Irishman in general with what most interested him as the head of
a particular family. It is remarkable, also, as an indication of the
_general_ nobility and elevation which had accompanied the revolution
in his life, that concurrently with the constitutional torpor previously
besetting him, had melted away the intellectual torpor under which he
had found books until recently of little practical value. Lady Carbery
had herself told me that the two revolutions went on simultaneously. He
began to take an interest in literature when life itself unfolded a new
interest, under the companionship of his youthful wife. And here, by the
way, as subsequently in scores of other instances, I saw broad evidences
of the credulity with which we have adopted into our grave political
faith the rash and malicious sketches of our novelists. With Fielding
commenced the practice of systematically traducing our order of country
gentlemen. His picture of Squire Western is not only a malicious, but
also an incongruous libel. The squire's ordinary language is impossible,
being alternately bookish and absurdly rustic. In reality, the
conventional dialect ascribed to the rustic order in general--to
peasants even more than to gentlemen--in our English plays and novels,
is a childish and fantastic babble, belonging to no form of real
breathing life; nowhere intelligible; not in _any_ province; whilst, at
the same time, all provinces--Somersetshire, Devonshire, Hampshire--are
confounded with our midland counties; and positively the diction of
Parricombe and Charricombe from Exmoor Forest is mixed up with the
pure Icelandic forms of the English lakes, of North Yorkshire, and of
Northumberland. In Scotland, it needs but a slight intercourse with the
peasantry to distinguish various dialects--the Aberdonian and Fifeshire,
for instance, how easily distinguished, even by an English alien, from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account