Memorials of Human Superstition: being a paraphrase and commentary on the Historia Flagellantium of the Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the SorbonneLolme, Jean Louis de
History
Memorials of Human Superstition: being a paraphrase and commentary on the Historia Flagellantium of the Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the Sorbonne
Lolme, Jean Louis de
Boileau, Jacques, 1635-1716. Historia flagellantium; Flagellants
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE
Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.
Footnote anchors are denoted by [number], and the footnotes have
been placed at the end of each chapter. Many of the footnotes are
long and spread over several pages. Several footnotes have footnotes
themselves.
In this book the Table of Contents is at the end of the book.
Some minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.
MEMORIALS
OF
HUMAN SUPERSTITION;
Being a Paraphrase and Commentary on the
_HISTORIA FLAGELLANTIUM_ of the
Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the Sorbonne, Canon
of the Holy Chapel, &c.
By One who is not Doctor of the Sorbonne.
_Honni soit qui mal y pense._
THE SECOND EDITION.
[Illustration: _Page._ 391.]
LONDON:
Printed for G. ROBINSON, N^o 55, Pater-noster Row.
M DCC LXXXIV.
THE
INTRODUCTION
OF THE
PARAPHRAST AND COMMENTATOR.
The Abbé Boileau, the author of the _Historia Flagellantium_, was
elder brother to the celebrated Poet of that name. He filled, several
years, the place of Dean of the Metropolitan Church of Sens, and was
thence promoted to the office of one of the Canons of the Holy Chapel
in Paris, which is looked upon as a great dignity among the French
clergy.
While he was in that office (about the year 1700) he wrote, among
other books, that which is the subject of this work[1]. This book,
in which the public expected, from the title of it, to find an
history of the particular sect of Hereticks called Flagellants, only
contained an aggregation of facts and quotations on the subject
of self-disciplines and flagellations in general among Christians
(which, if the work had been well done, might however have been
equally interesting) and a mixture of alternate commendation and
blame of that practice.
The Theologians of that time, however, took offence at the book.
They judged that the author had been guilty, in it, of several
heretical assertions; for instance, in saying, as he does in two or
three places, that Jesus Christ had suffered flagellation against
his will: and they particularly blamed the censures which, amidst
his commendations of it, he had passed upon a practice that so many
saints had adopted, so many pontiffs and bishops had advised, and so
many ecclesiastical writers had commended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account