These city actors would have thought it absurd to render shepherds as
quiet, well-educated men. Did they not know plenty of shepherds round
Chester who had hard times and hard fare, and whose only knowledge was
of the diseases of animals? Were they not plagued with mischievous
shepherd-boys who were ever ready for fun and play? And if Noah’s wife
was a shrew, were they not well acquainted with many such, and was
not the scold’s bridle and the ducking-stool kept at the Cross for
such offending citizens? And can we blame them for looking upon many
of the characters mentioned in the Bible as being ordinary everyday
personages? I think not. However, opinions on this point will always
be divided, and the following quotations from the writings of two
well-educated women, who lived 100 years apart, are interesting:--
“Next he (Mr. Bryant) spoke upon the Mysteries, or origin of our
theatrical entertainments, and repeated the plan and conduct
of several of these strange compositions, in particular one he
remembered, which was called _Noah’s Ark_, and in which that patriarch
and his sons, just previous to the Deluge, made it all their delight
to speed themselves into the ark without Mrs. Noah, whom they wished
to escape; but she surprised them just as they had embarked, and made
so prodigious a racket against the door that, after a long and violent
contention, she forced them to open it, and gained admission, having
first contented them by being kept out till she was thoroughly wet to
the skin.
“These most eccentric and unaccountable dramas filled up chief of our
conversation; and whether to consider them most with laughter, as
ludicrous, or with horror, as blasphemous, remains a doubt I cannot
well solve.”
So wrote that somewhat priggish but clever and witty young authoress,
Miss Fanny Burney, in the eighteenth century.[7]
[7] It may be interesting to note that her father, Dr. Burney, was
educated in Chester.
The following twentieth-century opinion is from a paper by the late
Mrs. Henry Sandford, a woman of sound judgment and of great educational
experience:--
“In the first place, we cannot but observe that, with all their
faults, they did keep vividly before the mind of the English nation
the leading outlines of Christian teaching, and that, in the
historical form suggested by the Apostles’ Creed. Much that was
legendary, coarse, incongruous, was there also, no doubt, but _that_
was there above all.
“The old religious drama created in the popular mind a high ideal of
the true use and purpose of dramatic art, namely, to present to the
imagination a living picture of the realities of life and feeling.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account