The following rimes, written in 1303 by Robert Manning (Le Brunne),
show this distinctly:--
“Hyt ys forebode in the decree
Miracles for to make or se
For miracles yf you begynne
Hyt ys a gaderynt, a syghte of synne
He may in the churche, thurgh thys resun
Play the resurrecyon.
Yf thou do it in weyis or grenys
A syghte of synne truly hyt semys.”
As late as 1385 we find William of Wykeham objecting to the plays
taking place in the churchyard, and threatening those who should lend
vestments from the church to the actors.[14]
[14] We must not forget that the Welsh played interludes in their
churchyards on Sunday afternoons down to a very late period.
The opposition of the clergy might have been fatal to the continuance
of Miracle Plays but for the Feast of Corpus Christi, which was
instituted in 1264, and firmly established in 1311. On this day
the people and the trade gilds took part in processions with the
clergy, carrying pictures and images of saints, and sometimes
accompanied by the members of the gilds dressed as angels, the twelve
apostles, &c.[15] From this parade it was an easy step to dramatic
representation; and this day was rigidly adhered to by the gilds as
their great and common festival.
[15] This is frequently to be seen in Italy at the present day.
Chester has always had the credit of being an exception to the rule by
holding the performances of the plays at Whitsuntide, but this view is
incorrect, and Chester was, at first, in line with other places, for
we find from the Bakers’ Charter, 2 Edward IV. (which is the earliest
authoritative allusion to the plays), that “there hath been tyme out of
mind a company of bakers,” and they are “to be redy to pay the costes
and expenses and play and light of _Corpus Christi_ as oft tymes as it
shall be assessed.”[16] Chester’s gilds were numerous and powerful, and
many of them exist in some form or other at the present day.
[16] The alteration must have occurred very soon after this, for the
“Banes,” quoted later, which gives Whitsuntide as the time of the
plays, cannot, I think, be much later than 1470.
The authorship of the plays is generally attributed to Ralf Higden, the
author of _Polychronicon_, and a monk of Chester, where he is said to
have died at a great age in 1353. But there is no evidence to justify
such a definite statement as this. All we know of the origin of the
plays is found in the following:--
1. A “Banes,” XV. Cent., giving Sir John Arneway as the “deviser.”
He was Mayor 1268-1276;
2. A Proclamation, _c._ 1520, giving Arneway as the “deviser,” and
Francis, a monk, as the writer.
3. A “Banes,” _c._ 1570, giving Arneway as “deviser,” and a “Dom
Randall” as the writer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account