Derbyshire (England) -- Antiquities; Derbyshire (England) -- History
The highly interesting feature of this late Elizabethan plan is the
series of little outline pictures illustrative of the buildings of the
chief places within the forest district. Each of these is here given in
exact outline after the original, except that there is a dash of colour
on the roofs of all the buildings, which throws them into better
relief. Interesting as these are from an art point of view, they have
to be accepted with some caution as accurate in a topographical sense.
It is not, for instance, possible to imagine but that the sketch of the
Peak Castle was somewhat imaginary; nor can the sketches of some of
the churches be made to fit with the extant fabrics. It should also be
remarked that this plan is a good deal blemished in places by having
been roughly divided into three parts, with the result that several
fragments are now missing, and the sketches of Castleton and Hayfield
are somewhat mutilated.[77]
[77] When the list of the Duchy of Lancaster Maps and Plans was
recently drawn up and printed at the Public Record Office, the fact
that these three portions belonged to the same map was not recognised;
they are to be found under the respective numbers 7, 37, and 44.
[Illustration: No. 1.]
The view of Glossop may certainly be taken to prove that the old town
had its houses arranged in irregular blocks round the large church
as a centre (1). The parish church of Glossop was completely rebuilt
between 1831 and 1853; it is not, therefore, possible to say how far
the outline in the map is accurate. It is, however, fair to assume,
with regard to the churches as well as the houses, that the artist made
some effort to represent the reality, or otherwise the series of little
pictures would hardly have had so great a variety.
With regard to Hayfield church, the like difficulty arises, for the
old building was demolished in 1836; and here again it is difficult to
believe that the delineator drew this form of a church out of his own
imagination (2). In this case a portion of the hamlet on the left-hand
side has been torn off.
[Illustration: No. 2.]
The third pictured town in this division is Mellor, and in this
instance, too, the church was entirely rebuilt at the beginning of
last century, save for the western tower (3). A proof is here afforded
of some measure of accuracy, for in this case the western tower is
represented in its right place, and not as rising from the centre of
the building, as shown in the cases of Glossop and Hayfield. There
are, also, traces at the top of Mellor tower of its having formerly
supported a small spire, as is here shown.
[Illustration: No. 3.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account