Memories of My Life: Being My Personal, Professional, and Social Recollections as Woman and ArtistBernhardt, Sarah
General
Memories of My Life: Being My Personal, Professional, and Social Recollections as Woman and Artist
Bernhardt, Sarah
Actors -- Biography; Bernhardt, Sarah, 1844-1923; Women -- Biography
“The work of Mlle. Sarah Bernhardt deserves to be studied in detail. The
head of the grandmother, well worked out as to the profound wrinkles it
bears, expresses that intense sorrow in which everything else counts as
nothing. The only reproach I have to bring against this artist is that
she has brought too much into prominence the muscles of the neck of the
old grandmother. This shows a lack of experience. She is pleased with
herself for having studied anatomy so well and is not sorry for the
opportunity of showing it. It is,” etc., etc....
Certainly this gentleman was right—I had studied anatomy eagerly and in
a very amusing manner. I had had lessons from Doctor Parrot who was so
good to me. I had continually with me a book of anatomical designs, and
when I was at home I stood before the glass and said suddenly to myself,
putting my finger on some part of my body: “Now, then, what is that?” I
had to answer immediately, without hesitation, and when I hesitated I
compelled myself to learn by heart the muscles of the head or the arm
and did not sleep till this was done.
A month after the exhibition there was a reading of Parodi’s play, “Rome
Vaincue,” at the Comédie Française. I refused the rôle of the young
vestal _Opïmia_, which had been allotted to me, and energetically
demanded that of _Posthumia_, an old blind Roman woman with a superb and
noble face. No doubt there was some connection in my mind between my old
Breton weeping over her son, and the august patrician claiming pardon
for her granddaughter.
Perrin was at first astounded. Afterwards he acceded to my request. But
his order-loving mind, and his taste for symmetry made him anxious about
Mounet-Sully, who was also playing in the piece. He was accustomed to
seeing Mounet-Sully and me playing the two heroes, the two lovers, the
two victims. How was he to arrange matters so that we should still be
the two ... together? Eureka! There was in the play an old idiot named
_Vastaepor_, who was quite unnecessary for the action of the piece, but
had been brought in to satisfy Perrin. “Eureka!” cried the director of
the Comédie, “Mounet-Sully shall play _Vestaepor_!” Equilibrium was
restored. The God of the _bourgeois_ was content.
The piece, which was really quite mediocre, obtained a big success at
the first presentation (27th September, 1876), and personally I was very
successful in the fourth act. The crowd was decidedly in my favor in
spite of everything and everybody.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account