There are few subjects upon which more nonsense has been talked and
written than there has been about the age of trees. Some years ago I
saw a letter written to the _Times_ (I think) about a catalpa tree in
Gray’s Inn Garden, which was said to have been planted by Sir Walter
Raleigh (the catalpa, by the by, was first introduced into England in the
year 1726!), and in that letter the writer alluded to the sequoias or
Wellingtonias, which he said must have been already mature trees “when
Abraham was a little boy!” I felt how pleased that gentleman was with
himself when he concocted that phrase. Sir Joseph Hooker, Mr. Carruthers
and I once took the trouble to count accurately the rings on the section
of the sequoia in the Natural History Museum. They numbered one thousand
three hundred and thirty-five. “This particular tree was sixty-two feet
in girth at eight feet from the ground; three hundred feet high, and
without branches for two hundred feet of its height.” (Veitch’s “Manual
of Conifers.”) “From these and other authentic data,” says Veitch’s
book, “it is not unsafe to infer that none of the existing Wellingtonias
antedate the Christian Era, or that with very few exceptions, the oldest
of them reach within five hundred years of that epoch, whose ages,
therefore, do not much exceed that of the oldest yews in Great Britain.”
The yew is, as is well known, the oldest tree that we have; but here
again there is great exaggeration. I was once shown a yew tree in Hayling
Island which I was solemnly assured was standing there at the time of
Julius Cæsar’s landing. That a yew tree stood there is very possible; but
that particular yew tree, no! I have seen a young tree growing out of an
old one that was a mere hollow shell, the seed having germinated within
it. Many a legend in regard to yews may have started in that way; the
old host gradually rotting away to make room for the guest. Seedlings may
rise close to the recorded tree and in the course of centuries be taken
by ignorant or careless observers for it. As regards the age of oaks,
the old homely tradition is probably founded on something like fact.
Three hundred years of growth, three hundred standing still—which is,
of course, nonsense, for in this world nothing stands still—and three
hundred years in which to decay. Dryden put it into verse.
“The monarch oak, the patriarch of trees
Shoots rising up, and spreads by slow degrees:
Three centuries he grows, and three he stays
Supreme in state: and in three more decays.
“PALAEMON AND ARCITE.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account