Christian sociology; Labor -- United States; Labor movement -- United States; Working class -- United States
The first minister in the district was a graduate and honor man of
Williams College, and the church was the center of the community
life. People looked to the church, were helped and inspired; it
sent out teachers, preachers, and other men and women trained
in thoughtfulness, to enrich the world. Contributions of such a
range cannot spring from the conditions in which the church finds
itself to-day. What are the reasons? Some of the people blame the
universities. When the young people return from college they seem to
take no interest in the church. But the universities are really not to
blame. The church fills so small a circle in the community that when
the young man has finished his course at the university he cannot fit
himself back into the narrow groove of the church activities. In sixty
years the old methods of farming have changed. Tools and machinery are
of another type. Conditions on the farm are totally different, because
the farmers have recognized that new methods are demanded. When the old
settlers have their picnics and reunions, one of the older men shows
the young men how they used to “cradle” the grain. It is an interesting
thing, but compared to the modern reaper the cradle is simply an
archaic tool, and no man would think of harvesting his crop with it
to-day. The fields of the church life of rural Wisconsin and in other
sections of the country are “white to the harvest,” but the ministers
are forced to use the old-fashioned “cradle” in harvesting the whole
crop. The university is showing the church its opportunity and at the
same time pointing out its failure. In the particular locality under
discussion the churches have no program. Religion is limited to a very
small part of life. The farm demands all the time of the people during
six days of the week. On Sunday the work clothes are changed for Sunday
clothes and part of the day given over to the church. This is religion.
The line of demarkation between the sacred and the secular is much
more clearly drawn in the country than anywhere else. The average
minister of the country church is much more a man apart from the rest
of the community.
The program of the church must be made a part of the whole life of the
people. The church out in the districts where the people live who are
producing the food for the world is responsible in a large degree for
the pleasures of the people. Country people find it difficult to think
in terms of the community. It is hard for them to cooperate. The church
must shape its program with a clear understanding of the great facts of
the community life, and appeal primarily from this standpoint and not
simply from that of the needs of individuals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account