From what has been said it will now be clear that the applicability of the Mendelian hypothesis has, intrinsically, nothing whatever to do with the question of the inheritance being _blended_ or _alternative_. In fact, as soon as the relation of zygote characters to gamete characters is appreciated, it is difficult to see any reason for supposing that the manifestation of characters seen in the zygotes should give any indication as to their mode of allotment among the gametes. On a previous occasion I pointed out that the terms “Heredity” and “Inheritance” are founded on a misapplication of metaphor, and in the light of our present knowledge it is becoming clearer that the ideas of “transmission” of a character by parent to offspring, or of there being any “contribution” made by an ancestor to its posterity, must only be admitted under the strictest reserve, and merely as descriptive terms. * * * * * We are now presented with some entirely new conceptions:-- (1) The purity of the gametes in regard to certain characters. (2) The distinction of all zygotes according as they are or are not formed by the union of like or unlike gametes. In the former case, apart from Variation, they breed true when mated with their like; in the latter case their offspring, collectively, will be heterogeneous. (3) If the zygote be formed by the union of dissimilar gametes, we may meet the phenomenon of (_a_) dominant and recessive characters; (_b_) a blend form; (_c_) a form distinct from either parent, often reversionary[20]. [20] This fact sufficiently indicates the difficulties involved in a superficial treatment of the phenomenon of reversion. To call such reversions as those named above “returns to ancestral type” would be, if more than a descriptive phrase were intended, quite misleading. It is not the ancestral _type_ that has come back, but something else has come in its guise, as the offspring presently prove. For the first time we thus begin to get a rationale of “reversion.” But there are additional and even more significant deductions from the facts. We have seen that the gametes are differentiated in respect of pure characters. Of these pure characters there may _conceivably_ be any number associated together in one organism. In the pea Mendel detected at least seven--not all seen by him combined in the same plant, but there is every likelihood that they are all capable of being thus combined.