Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America — John Shaqi
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
Certain of the manuscripts give the ancient home of the Aztec as
Aztlan, and picture it as an island in the centre of a lake, with
a city called Colhuacan on the opposite shore. From here the Aztec
started in the year dated _1. tecpatl_ (“one stone knife,” i.e. 1168
A.D.), and at Colhuacan received their god, Uitzilopochtli, and joined
themselves to eight other related tribes. Five of these ultimately
formed the population of the following cities, chiefly in the Valley
of Mexico, Uexotzinco, Chalco, Xochimilco, Cuitlauac, Malinalco
(see the map of the Mexican Valley, Fig. 1); the others being the
Chichimec, Tepanec (founders of Azcapotzalco) and Matlatzinca. Later
they arrived at Tamoanchan, the “House of descent,” a word probably
meaning little more than the “place where the tribes separated,” for
here the eight tribes left them to continue their journey alone. Hence
they went to Chicomoztoc, and Cuextecatl Ichocayan, the “place where
the Huaxtec weep,” where they are represented as having made prisoners
from among this nation. After wandering in the steppes they came to
Tulan, and then to Chapultepec; and, after having been reduced for
some time to slavery in Colhuacan, settled finally in Tenochtitlan.
It is difficult to estimate the amount of authenticity which may be
attributed to this legend; the description of the ancient home seems
to reproduce the geographical position of Tenochtitlan, situated on
an island opposite a mainland town called Colhuacan, in a rather
suspicious manner. Still it seems to have been a habit of the Nahua
tribes to select such situations for their cities, in proof of which
one need only mention such towns as Zumpango, Xaltocan, Cuitlauac,
Xochimilco and Acocolco, a previous residence of the Aztec. Fig. 2
illustrates the portion of the Boturini codex which pictures the start
from Aztlan to Colhuacan, the footsteps indicating the route, and
the eight figures to the right accompanied by glyphs, representing
the eight tribes mentioned above, reading from bottom to top. The
situation of Aztlan, if the place is not entirely mythical, has given
rise to a good deal of controversy; some have identified Colhuacan
with Culiacan on the coast of Sinaloa, while Seler suggests that
it was in fact the historical city of that name, Aztlan being the
island of Acocolco whence the Mexicans were deported as slaves to
Colhuacan, a historical fact. The term Colhuan was in historical times
restricted to the inhabitants of this city, with whom the population of
Xochimilco and Malinalco were closely connected. Chicomoztoc figures
as a halting-place in practically all legends dealing with the Nahua
immigration, and in some it is regarded as the starting-point. Besides
the tribes above mentioned, the following are also represented as
having made some stay there: the Huaxtec, Olmec, Xicalanca, Totonac,
Michoacans, Tlalhuica, Acolhua (Tezcocans), Tlaxcalans, the inhabitants
of Teotitlan and Tehuacan, and the Mixtec. Beyond this we shall see
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account