Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
true solar time, and it is probable that the feasts appropriate to
certain seasons were shifted from month to month when the discrepancy
became noticeable. Perhaps then these calculations had reference to
the ritual calendar in accordance with which the various festivals
were held. It must be remembered that the Maya in their count of days
reckoned only elapsed time, expressing only a full tale of days. Thus
each date is in one sense one day behind the date as we express it.
This sounds complicated, but the difficulty disappears if we regard
their method from the same point of view as our own reading of the
clock. Whereas we speak of the fifteenth of June while the day is yet
incomplete, yet we refer to a point in the third hour after noon in
terms of two o’clock, viz. 2.20, or 2.45. Thus for the first day of a
month we find the symbol zero, and 0. zotz means that the month zip is
concluded, but that the first day of zotz is not yet complete. So it
is that the katuns (and other periods) are known by the name of the
last day of the previous katun, 5. ahau, 3. ahau, and so on, and are
not named after the day imix which is the first of the series of twenty
day-signs, and is actually the first day of the time-periods from cycle
to tun. The Maya method of dating enabled them to fix the position of
a definite day without risk of confusion over long periods of time. If
the day-sign with its attendant number, and the position in a definite
month, is given, that day is fixed for a period of 52 years. If the
number of the tun in which it occurs is also stated, it is fixed for
a period of 936 years (i.e. 936 years must elapse before a day with a
similar series of signs and numbers can recur). If the number of the
katun is also expressed, the position is determined for 18,720 years;
and if the number of the cycle as well, a period of 374,400 years.
[Illustration: FIG. 56.--Date inscriptions.
A. Normal numerals, reading 9. 15. 0. 0. 0.[6] 4.
_ahau_, 13 _yax_. (Copan, altar S). B.
Face-numerals, reading 9. 16. 10. 0. 0. 1. _ahau_, 3.
_zip_. (Quirigua, stela F).
(_After Maudslay_)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account