Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
Since the year contained 365 days, and the day-signs were 20 in number,
it is obvious that the year began on one of four days. These days,
later called “year-bearers,” were, at the time of the monuments and
the writing of the Dresden codex, ben, eznab, akbal and lamat, which
correspond to the days which began the Mexican year, acatl, tecpatl,
calli and tochtli. However, the year-bearers as given by Landa, and
also as they appear in the Troano-Cortesianus codex, are kan, muluc,
ix and cauac. This means that in the interval the commencement of the
year had shifted (5 × _x_) + 1 days, _x_ being an unknown
quantity. By this time too the long count in its most elaborate form
seems to have been abandoned, and the katun became the highest unit,
known by the name of its “initial” day, e.g. katun 6. ahau, or katun
4. ahau. It is this method of reckoning which is employed in the books
of Chilan Balam. Most of the other races of Maya stock, as far as is
known, possessed calendars which included a series of twenty day-signs
(see Appendix I) combined with the numerals one to thirteen, but the
count of the Kakchiquel was different, being purely vigesimal. The
periods involved were one of 400 days (20 × 20), called _huna_,
and a larger of 8000 days (20 huna), called _may_. The huna was
known by its initial day _ah_ (corresponding to ben and acatl)
together with the number which might be attached to it, and the time
count dated from the destruction of a rebellious sub-tribe, the
Tukuchi, which occurred in a huna 11. ah.
[Illustration: FIG. 57.--Upper row, world-direction
signs; lower row, colours.
A. East and yellow. B. North and red. C. West and white.
D. South and black.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account