Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
value of which depended on their size. Both Cogolludo and Torquemada
speak of copper currency axe-blades, very thin and in the form of an
inverted T, which were imported from Mexico. The latter author states
that four of these, if new, were equivalent to five _reales_, but
that damaged specimens were only valuable for melting down and went at
ten to the _real_. Feathers were also employed as currency, and
in some places cloth, as in Mexico. The system of enumeration employed
in commerce was in the main vigesimal. The count proceeded by fives to
twenty, by twenties to one hundred, and by hundreds to four hundred;
from this point the higher numbers were reckoned in multiples of twenty.
[Illustration: FIG. 60.--Detail from the relief in
the great tlaxtli-court at Chichen Itza.
(_After Seler_)]
The question of war and weapons is particularly interesting from
archæological and ethnological points of view. Taken as a whole the
monuments show few traces of military activity, and at some sites,
notably Copan, Quirigua and Palenque, armed figures are not seen at
all, for the axe which appears at the two latter sites is obviously
a purely ceremonial object. To omit Yucatan for the moment, it is
worthy of notice that reliefs suggesting the figures of warriors are
practically only found in the northern portion of the region over which
the earlier remains extend, viz. at Piedras Negras, Menché, Naranjo
and Tikal. The suggestion is conveyed by the presence of one or more
bound figures subsidiary to the main personage represented upon the
sculpture, or by the fact that the latter stands upon a crouching
figure of distinctly different, and far lower, type of physiognomy.
Tikal may almost be omitted from the above list, since only one such
relief occurs, and it resembles rather the sculptures of Menché than
the archaic stelæ which appear to be more characteristic of the site.
It is not absolutely certain, moreover, that the crouching figures
which serve as supporters represent actual prisoners, since in some
cases the main figure is shown with attributes which are of a purely
ceremonial nature; still the arrangement is suggestive, and it is
worthy of notice that by far the largest number of such stelæ is found
at Naranjo. Where the main figure is shown with a weapon, that weapon
is almost invariably a spear with a head of flaked stone. Such spears
are always rather elaborate and ornamental in form, and in some cases
it is difficult to distinguish them from a ceremonial staff. As stated
above, I do not think that the ceremonial axe can fairly be considered
a weapon, but one “axe” is shown in the hands of a figure at Menché
(stela II), which seems to answer to the description of the “swords”
seen by Columbus in Ruatan. The latter consisted of an edging of stone
flakes set in a groove in a wooden haft, and secured by lashing of
fish intestines. Shields are shown at most sites, and conform in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account