Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
A word may now be said concerning the “Toltec” culture of the Mexican
valley. The fact that this is related to the early culture of the
Maya is, as said before, obvious. Many points of similarity exist in
religious symbolism, art (such as the interlaced trapezoidal sign
described above), glyphs surrounded by a cartouche, and the bar-form
of the numeral five. If my dating of the monuments be accepted
provisionally, and also the suggestion that the calendar had its origin
with the Maya, then it follows necessarily that the Toltec culture
was due at least to Maya inspiration. The myth of the arrival of the
god Quetzalcoatl, inventor of the calendar, symbolizes the spread
of Maya culture northwards. There are so many instances of the god
being taken as the representative of his people, and I have already
shown how the high mysterious creator-god Kukulkan seems to have lost
dignity when he became personified as a tribal leader. The myth of
the immigrant Nahua tribes awaiting the “dawn for the administration
of society” at Teotihuacan then represents their first contact with
the culture derived from the Maya. So far the matter is simple, but
a difficulty now arises. The last Maya date in the long count, at
Chacula on the Chiapas border, falls about the middle of the fourth
century A.D. The Annals of Quauhtitlan give the foundation
of the Toltec state as 752 A.D. The migration-myth last
mentioned states that the Toltec were with the other Nahua immigrants
at Teotihuacan when the “dawn” appeared. These Toltec are definitely
stated to have been Nahua-speakers, while the name of the first Toltec
ruler, Mixcoamazatzin, is distinctly Nahua. Finally, the list of Toltec
rulers, seven only in number, is far too short to account for the
thick stratum of Toltec remains at Azcapotzalco. The only explanation
possible surely must be the following: The early Maya culture had
slowly crept up into the Mexican valley, through western Chiapas,
Oaxaca and Teotitlan, becoming somewhat attenuated in the process.
There it persisted for some centuries without striking development,
and perhaps gradually deteriorating. Then began the southerly drift
of the Nahua tribes, of whom the first to arrive, the Toltec, imposed
themselves as a ruling caste upon the agricultural population, adopting
their mode of life and culture, and developing the latter in accordance
with their own particular genius, but imposing their own language upon
the tribes whom they welded into an empire. But the pressure from the
north continued, wave after wave of “Chichimec” migration broke upon
the valley. The Toltec power fell, and the incursion of the wilder
tribes gave rise to migrations, such as those of the Olmec, Quiché
and Kakchiquel, which followed for the most part an easterly route,
at any rate in their initial stages. In the valley, the history of
the Toltec was reflected in the short-lived attempts of the Chichimec
and Tepanec to establish empires, but was practically repeated by the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account