Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
The position of the Huaxtec now arises. In them we have a Maya-speaking
people, practising certain definitely Maya customs such as tooth-filing
and -inlay, and inhumation as opposed to cremation, yet apparently
without a script. As far as their art is concerned, the sculptures of
the Panuco valley bear a closer resemblance to those of the Maya,
especially to certain stelæ at Piedras Negras, than the Aztec. The
isolation of this definitely Maya branch would seem to imply that the
Maya in the earliest days of all must have spread from Guatemala up
the east coast of Mexico as far as Tampico, penetrating into Chiapas,
and possibly Oaxaca, and colonizing the Mexican valley, where they
found a primitive people akin to the earliest population of Michoacan.
In times subsequent to what I may call this proto-Maya movement there
took place in the southern fertile region a great cultural development,
culminating in the organization of a calendar, the invention of a
script, and the construction of the ruined “cities.” The culture
developed here spread, as I have indicated on p. 361, but slowly,
since the land was by no means overpopulated, and life was easy. For
some reason it took a westerly course, _via_ Oaxaca, and never
reached the Huaxtec, who remained confined to the coast by the eastern
cordillera and held little communication with their western neighbours.
In later times, at any rate, they were cut off from the southern Maya
by the stream of migration which passed from the valley of Mexico and
its neighbourhood eastward, and they may well have been isolated at
an earlier period by some similar movement in this direction. At any
rate an early tendency towards migration on these lines is seen in
the legends of the Tutal Xiu, who left Nonoual in the second century,
probably under pressure exercised by tribes to the west.
The chief objection to this theory of the origin and development of the
Maya culture, as far as I can see, is that in Guatemala and Honduras no
certain traces of a proto-Maya culture have as yet been discovered, but
that the civilization springs, as it were, full-blown from the earth.
The answer would be that the finest ruins have focussed all attention
up to the present, and that earlier manifestations of the culture have
not been sought, while the difficulties afforded by environment and
climate place serious obstacles in the way of systematic excavation.
Further, the art itself affords many indications that it is based upon
wood-carving, and the conditions are not favourable to the survival of
any remains save those constructed in stone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account