Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
The question of the obsequies of the dead next arises, and we find two
methods of disposal practised in Mexico, cremation and inhumation. The
first of these appears to be the more characteristic of the hunting
tribes, though the account of Sahagun would seem to show that the
Chichimec originally practised the latter. This people were said to
be extremely long-lived, and protracted ill-health was regarded as so
uncanny that if a malady lasted over four or five days, the patient
was killed. The Tarascans certainly employed cremation; in the case
of the king, the body was laid out by the principal chiefs, who were
summoned during his illness, and carried in state by night to a temple,
where it was burned. A number of slaves accompanied the procession,
playing on tortoise-carapaces and rattles formed of a serrated bone
along which a stick was rubbed; these slaves were killed while the
pyre was burning, and were buried separately behind the temple. The
ashes of the king were made into a mummy-pack with a false head and
mask, which was buried seated in a large urn at the foot of the temple
steps facing eastward. The grave was roofed with wooden slabs, and
earth was heaped upon the top. Those killed in war were also burnt with
their bows before the temple, and their ashes buried in urns. Though
the wilder Chichimec, as stated above, appear to have simply buried
their dead, yet the early Chichimec kings in the valley of Mexico,
Xolotl, Nopaltzin and Quinatzin, are said to have been burnt and their
ashes deposited in urns in caves. At Teotihuacan, a site where the
Toltec culture flourished for a considerable period, unburned burials
are found, and it is probable, from other evidence, that cremation is
not typical of this civilization. The Acolhua practised cremation and
buried the ashes. The Aztec practised both forms of disposal of the
dead, but cremation, which, according to the early commentator on the
MS. known as Vaticanus A, they learnt from the Otomi, was the more
common. The deceased was made up into a mummy-pack with quantities of
paper, which was supposed to enable him to pass through the various
dangers to be encountered on his journey to the underworld, and decked
with appropriate ornaments (Fig. 14, _a_). Water was sprinkled
over his head, and a supply for his journey provided in a small vessel;
his red dog (shown in the illustration) was killed, and dog and master
were burnt together with various articles of personal property which
might be wanted in the other world. In many cases this privilege was
allowed to slaves destined for sacrifice, and they were permitted to
burn their small effects before they mounted the sacrificial stone. The
ashes were collected and placed in a vase or stone coffer, together
with a small jewel (the lip-plug of the deceased) to serve as a
“heart,” and buried. Offerings were made on the grave after twenty
days’ interval, and again after eighty days. These were repeated on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account