Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
The purpose of the present work is to afford some connected account of
this pre-Spanish culture, and to correlate the accounts of eyewitnesses
and early visitors with the material remains which the investigations
of later times have revealed. But in order to obtain a proper view
of Mexican culture it is necessary to transcend the limits of Mexico
itself. In the country to the south and east, in Guatemala and
northern Honduras, are the remains of ruined buildings which are, both
architecturally and artistically, superior to those of Mexico proper,
and which had been deserted before the coming of the Spaniards. These
were the work of the Maya, a people whose name is far less familiar
to the general public than that of the Aztec, but who, as I hope to
show, evolved a culture of their own when the Aztec were yet primitive
nomadic hunters, and who furnished the latter people with the materials
for that civilization which so astonished the followers of Cortés.
The actual area with which this book deals is, roughly, that portion of
Mexico which lies between the tropic of Cancer and the northern strip
of Honduras. It is divided naturally into two portions, a northern
and western, and a southern and eastern, by the depression which cuts
across the isthmus of Tehuantepec. The natural division corresponds
very conveniently with the archæological; to the north and west lies
the seat of Mexican culture, to the south and east, of the Mayan; but
it must be remembered that the Maya-speaking people extended at the
conquest practically throughout Vera Cruz, though they had by that time
fallen under Aztec influence. I propose therefore to divide this book
into two corresponding sections, dealing first with the “Mexican” area,
and later with the “Mayan.” Both from the chronological and cultural
points of view the Mayan area should come first, but, as will appear
later, we are dependent to so great an extent upon our knowledge of
Mexican civilization for our interpretation of Mayan archæology, that
it will be more convenient to give the Mexican priority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account