Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
and regulated the inner life of the clan. A land system somewhat
similar to that of the Mexican calpulli existed among the Mixtec in so
far as land appears to have been hereditary in families but could not
pass outside the local group. Below the members of the calpulli ranked
certain freemen who farmed the lands of the lords on payment of a
rental (in kind), and, finally, a class of serfs who were bound to the
soil and probably represented the remnants of the early agricultural
population. The Mexican social system therefore comprised a landed
aristocracy who paid no definite taxes, but owed service to the king;
associated with them was a military nobility who held lands at the
king’s goodwill, and whose tenants paid royal taxes. Lower in rank
were the calpulli freemen, who paid taxes in common; still lower, the
tax-paying rent-holders, and finally the serfs, who paid taxes only to
their feudal lords. In addition to these there was the official class,
their sons and descendants, who, ranking as warriors and noble, paid
no definite taxes, but contributed their personal services and formed
the suite of the ruler. The office-holders were known by the generic
name of Tecutli, and the positions which they occupied were essentially
military in origin; four of them were placed as overseers of the four
districts into which the city was divided for administrative purposes,
and acted as representatives of the Tlacatecutli, or ruler. Besides
these there were the judicial officials, treasurers, and a whole
host of overseers, of whom the lowest in rank, as in Peru, exercised
supervision over a few families only. The travelling merchants
constituted a peculiar and privileged class, and will be considered
later when the subject of trade is discussed. The expansion of the
power of Mexico brought many other cities under its influence, and
these were obliged to furnish tribute in kind, and were also liable to
military service. In important cities a governor, Petlacalcatl, was
placed, with a tax-gatherer, Calpixque, under him; in less important
districts a governor or a Calpixque resided in the principal city,
and the tribute was collected in the surrounding towns by subordinate
officials. Apart from a general supervision there was very little
interference with the tributary cities; the original rulers were
rarely displaced, but continued to govern according to the local
laws, and, with the exception that certain lands were often reserved
for the use of the Mexican crown, the property of the conquered was
respected. The rather loose nature of the suzerainty exercised by
Mexico over its dependents made revolt a frequent occurrence, but this
was hardly regarded as a drawback, owing to the ceremonial nature
of war and its function in providing victims for sacrifice. Tribute
was generally paid by a town or district in common, and consisted of
local produce and manufactures (Fig. 18). Produce-tribute, which was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account