Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
generally levied at harvest-time, was furnished by the common lands,
and stored in magazines in the principal cities. Maize and other grain
was contributed in large chests (Fig. 18, _l_), and cotton (_r_),
cacao (_a_) and pepper in bales. Of manufactured articles, textiles
(_s_) and ceremonial costumes (_m_) were the most common, but the
tribute-lists show a great variety. Many of the town-names in these
lists cannot now be located, but their geographical position can be
roughly assumed from the nature of their contributions. From Soconusco
came lip-plugs, cacao, feathers and hides, from Oaxaca province, gold
and cochineal (Fig. 18, _h_), from the Tlalhuica, paper and pottery.
Other forms of tribute were honey (_q_), lime, wood, salt (_g_), copal
(_o_), sea-shells (_e_), amber (_f_), rubber, live eagles, copper axes,
chalchiuitl beads (_c_), turquoise (_d_), swords, shields (_p_), and
canes filled with perfumes for smoking. Tax-gatherers were received
with great ceremony and respect, and the arrival of these officers at
the town of Quiauiztlan, in Vera Cruz, is described by Diaz. A special
apartment decked with flowers was prepared for them, together with
food and chocolate; they arrived dressed in richly embroidered cloaks
and loin-cloths, their hair bound up on their heads, each carrying
a crooked staff and a bouquet of flowers which he smelled from time
to time. The Totonac it is true complained to the Spaniards of the
harshness of Mexican rule, probably referring rather to the Aztec
demands for sacrificial victims. Tribute on the whole seems to have
been fairly assessed, and was remitted in years of famine.
While the first step in the evolution of the Mexican constitution
is marked by the election of Acamapitzin as king, in place of the
old tribal council under a president, yet it was the overthrow of
Azcapotzalco which gave the hegemony of the valley to Mexico, and
compelled it to provide for the administration of dependent cities.
A number of officials bearing titles similar to those at home were
sent to Coyoacan, and definite arrangements were made with the allied
states of Texcoco and Tlacopan in accordance with which the rulers of
these cities became, at least nominally, electors of the Mexican kings,
and placed the direction of their military policy in the hands of the
latter. It was only in military matters that the two confederate states
deferred to Mexico; they had their own sovereigns, their own laws and
provinces, and we are told that Tezcoco exercised dominion over no
less than fifteen of the last-named in the direction of the Atlantic
coast. Each ruler confirmed the election of their sub-chiefs, and they
of their dependents. Of the booty won by the united armies, two-fifths
was taken by Mexico, two-fifths by Tezcoco, and one-fifth by the small
state of Tlacopan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account