In 1848 Faraday gave five Friday night discourses, three of them on
the “Diamagnetic Condition of Flame and Gases.” In 1849 he gave two,
one of them on Plücker’s researches. In 1850 he gave two, one of them
being on the electricity of the air, the other on certain conditions of
freezing water. He had meanwhile continued to work at magnetism. The
twenty-third series dealt with the supposed diamagnetic polarity. It
incidentally discussed the distortion produced in a magnetic field by
a mass of copper in motion across it. The twenty-fourth series was on
the possible relation of gravity to electricity. The paper concludes
with the words: “Here end my trials for the present. The results are
negative. They do not shake my strong feeling of the existence of a
relation between gravity and electricity, though they give no proof
that such a relation exists.” The next series (the twenty-fifth) was
on the “Non-expansion of Gases by Magnetic Force” and on the “Magnetic
Characters of Oxygen [which he had found to be highly magnetic],
Nitrogen, and Space.” He had found that magnetically substances must be
classed either along with iron and the materials that point axially, or
else with bismuth and those that point equatorially, in the magnetic
field. The best vacuum he could procure he regarded as the zero of
these tests; but before adopting it as such, he verified by experiment
that even in a vacuum a magnetic body still tends from weaker to
stronger places in the magnetic field; while diamagnetic bodies tend
from stronger to weaker. He then says we must consider the magnetic
character and relation of _space_ free from any material substance.
“Mere space cannot act as matter acts, even though the utmost latitude
be allowed to the hypothesis of an ether.” He then proceeds as
follows:--
[Sidenote: MORE NEW WORDS.]
Now that the true zero is obtained, and the great variety of
material substances satisfactorily divided into two general
classes, it appears to me that we want another name for
the magnetic class, that we may avoid confusion. The word
_magnetic_ ought to be general, and include _all_ the phenomena
and effects produced by that power. But then a word for the
subdivision opposed to the diamagnetic class is necessary.
As the language of this branch of science may soon require
general and careful changes, I, assisted by a kind friend, have
thought that a word--not selected with particular care--might
be provisionally useful; and as the magnetism of iron, nickel,
and cobalt when in the magnetic field is like that of the
earth as a whole, so that when rendered active they place
themselves parallel to its axes or lines of magnetic force, I
have supposed that they and their similars (including oxygen
now) might be called paramagnetic bodies, giving the following
division:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account