_Chloride Magnesium._--When solid and wire fuzed in
non-conductor--When fuzed conducted very well and was
decomposed A and P Pole much action and gas--chlorine? At N
Pole Magnesium separated and no gas. Sometimes Magnesium burnt
flying off in globules burning brilliantly. When wire at that
pole put in water or white M A [muriatic acid] matter round
it acted powerfully evolving hydrogen and forming Magnesia;
and when wire and surrounding matter heated in spirit lamp
_Magnesium_ burnt with intense light into _Magnesia_. VERY GOOD
EXPT.
This recalls the “capital experiment” entry which Sir Humphry Davy
wrote after the account of his decomposition of caustic potash. On the
7th of April we come to a marvellous page of speculations. He has seen
that liquids, both solutions and fused salts, can be decomposed by
the current, and that at least one solid is capable of electrolysis.
But he finds that alloys and metals are not decomposed. He finds
that electrolysis is easiest for those compounds that consist of the
most diverse elements, and is led on to speculate as to the possible
constitution of those conductors that the current does not decompose.
This may involve a recasting of accepted ideas; but from such a step he
does not shrink, as the following extracts show:--
Metals _may_ not be compounds of elements most frequently
combined, but rather of such as are so similar to each other as
to pass out of the limit of voltaic decomposition.
13th April (same page).
If voltaic decomposition of the kind I believe then review
all substances upon the new view to see if they may not be
decomposable, &c. &c. &c.
[Sidenote: ATTRACTION BY POLES DOUBTED.]
He has now found that the facts observed do not admit of being
explained on the supposition that the motion of the ions is due to the
attraction of the poles, and accordingly there follows the entry:--
(Ap. 13, 1833.)
A single element is never attracted by a pole, _i.e._ without
attraction of other element at other pole. Hence doubt Mr.
Brande’s Expts on attraction of gases and vapours. Doubt
attraction by poles altogether.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account