Midwifery and the diseases of women : $b A descriptive and practical work showing the superiority of water-treatment in menstruation and its disorders, chlorosis, leucorrhea, fluor albus, prolapsus uteri, hysteria, spinal diseases, and other weaknesses of females, in pregnancy and its diseases, abortion, uterine hemorrhage, and the general management of childbirth, nursing, etc., etc.Shew, Joel
Science
Midwifery and the diseases of women : $b A descriptive and practical work showing the superiority of water-treatment in menstruation and its disorders, chlorosis, leucorrhea, fluor albus, prolapsus uteri, hysteria, spinal diseases, and other weaknesses of females, in pregnancy and its diseases, abortion, uterine hemorrhage, and the general management of childbirth, nursing, etc., etc.
Shew, Joel
Generative organs, Female -- Diseases; Gynecologic pathology; Hydrotherapy; Midwifery; Midwives; Obstetrics; Obstetrics -- Case studies; Pregnancy; Women -- Diseases; Women midwives
I cannot but think, however, that it would be a great improvement if our
modern ladies, some of them, at least, would be one half as careful in
regard to cleanliness as the Jewish people were.
The Romans believed the menstrual fluid to be endowed with the most
noxious qualities. It was, in short, regarded as a dangerous poison, the
exhalations of which alone are sufficient to turn all the sauces of a
whole kitchen, the cheeses of a whole dairy, and make a whole family
sick, and wilt all the flowers of a parterre.
If the ancients went to an extreme on one side in this matter, there is,
perhaps, equal danger with the moderns of going quite as far in the
opposite way. Certain it is, that too great pains cannot be taken in
reference to this period. It is generally true that old proverbs have at
least some truth on which they were originally founded. There was wisdom
in the Levitical law, so strict in regard to the purification of women
at this period.
Does the menstrual discharge consist of blood? This is a question
concerning which physiologists, both ancient and modern, have put forth
many speculations, and many experiments have been instituted to settle
the matter.
Hippocrates regarded the menstrual fluid like the blood of a slaughtered
animal, or, in other words, blood.
Aristotle was of the same notion, comparing it to the blood which flows
from a simple wound. It may be a question whether pure blood is
discharged; but that the fluid contains the most important properties of
blood, is a fact settled beyond dispute.
QUANTITY.
The quantity of menstrual discharge has been a matter of inquiry on the
part of medical men.
It would be a very difficult task, if indeed, not impossible, to
determine in any given case the precise amount of menstrual fluid
discharged at a single period. An approximation to the general rule is
all that can be reasonably looked for in investigations of this kind.
In cold regions, the discharge is more scanty; in hot, more profuse; and
in temperate climates, a medium quantity is observed.
Dr. Gooch, in his “Treatise on Midwifery,” quotes De Haen as having made
inquiries among poor women, who told him that they used only one cloth
at the period, which, when wet, was dried, and then applied again. He
then took a similar napkin, dipped it in blood, dried it, and applied
the same. This experiment he tried repeatedly, and from it he deduced
that from four to eight ounces, rarely ten, and most commonly about six,
of the menstrual fluid, are lost at each period.
When we consider the great difficulty in ascertaining accurately the
amount of menstrual fluid at a given period, and the great _show_ which
a comparatively small quantity of blood or menstrual fluid makes upon
white, or light-colored clothing, it is not at all surprising that
observers should have varied so much in regard to the true amount.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account