Migration of Birds (1979)Lincoln, Frederick Charles
Science
Migration of Birds (1979)
Lincoln, Frederick Charles
Birds; Birds -- Migration
As has been previously indicated, the advance of spring in the
northern interior is much more rapid than in the Mississippi Valley
and on the Gulf coast. In other words, in the North spring comes with
a rush, and, during the height of migration season in Saskatchewan,
the temperature in the southern part of the Mackenzie Valley just
about equals that in the Lake Superior area, 700 miles farther south.
Such conditions, coupled with the diagonal course of the birds
across this region of fast-moving spring, exert a great influence
on migration and are probably factors in the acceleration of travel
speed. However, it should be remembered that the birds are getting
closer to the breeding season and may be stimulated to travel faster
for this reason.
Thus it has been shown that the rate of migration varies greatly
under varying circumstances. Radar investigations along the eastern
coasts of the United States and England indicate spring migration is
several miles per hour faster than in the fall. Also, directions of
migrations in spring were much less diverse than in the fall, which
suggests less time lost in passage (Tedd and Lack 1958; Nisbet and
Drury 1967a). King and Farner (1963) found the same species put on
more fat preparatory to migration in the spring. This would give the
migrants greater energy reserves for longer flights at that season.
=ALTITUDE OF FLIGHT AND MIGRATION=
The factors regulating the heights of bird migration are not clear.
High-altitude flight may be used to locate familiar landmarks, fly
over fog or clouds, surmount physical barriers, gain advantage
of a following wind, or maintain a better physiological balance.
Meteorological conditions probably account for most of the
high-altitude records. Wind conditions at ground level are usually
quite different in direction and velocity than at points higher up.
In general, human estimates of bird heights are quite unreliable
except under special conditions, and these estimates will vary with
the eyesight of the observer. Lucanus (1911) found a European sparrow
hawk could be distinguished at 800 feet but disappeared from sight at
2,800 feet. A rook (a European member of the crow family) could be
recognized at 1,000 feet but disappeared from sight at 3,300 feet.
Meinertzhagen (1955) did an interesting experiment with an inflated
model of a vulture painted black; it had a wing expanse of 7 feet 10
inches. When released from an airplane at 4,700 feet, it was barely
visible and invisible without binoculars at 5,800 feet. At 7,000 feet
it was not picked up even when ×12 binoculars were used.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account