Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance — John Shaqi
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the RenaissanceJacob, P. L.
History
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance
Jacob, P. L.
Europe -- Social life and customs; Manners and customs -- History; Middle Ages; Renaissance
The communal movement, a natural development of the legal rights
introduced by the Franks, was scarcely felt in England. Already, long
before the Norman Conquest, under the Anglo-Saxon rule, many busy
towns, wealthy and populous, such as Canterbury, London, Oxford, and
York, took a share in public affairs, a limited share, it is true,
but one sufficient for their wellbeing and prosperity. The victorious
invasion of William of Normandy, so fatal to the whole country, was
still more so to the large towns, which were compelled to behold
their own material ruin, the sequestration and confiscation of their
property, the dispersion and infeudation of their inhabitants, their
agriculturists and their farmers. Unable any longer to invoke the
protection of an easy-natured sovereign, they were forced to bow
their heads beneath the sway of strangers, lucky adventurers, bold,
exacting, despotic, and cruel men, believing in no faith and obeying
no law, the very dregs of French feudalism. King Henry I., the third
son of William the Conqueror, after many sanguinary struggles, in
which his barons were not found wanting in fealty to him, granted
them the celebrated charter called Magna Charta--usually, though,
erroneously, considered the fundamental origin of English liberties,
which, however, really dated from a prior period; at the same time
(1132) he released the burgesses of London from the lamentable state
of degradation in which they had existed since the Conquest. In the
reign of Henry II.--an administrative and judicial reformer--not in
England alone, but in those parts of Scotland and Ireland which he
had conquered (1154–1182), the inhabitants of many towns acquired the
right to purchase the freehold of the soil they occupied, and to free
themselves from several special taxes by paying a fixed sum to the
feudal lord. Thenceforward arose that haughty bourgeoisie, with which
the barons had soon to reckon, a class which John Lackland favoured
proportionately as he dreaded the continual rebellions of the feudal
seigniors. Twice was Prince Louis, the son of Philip-Augustus, summoned
by the Anglo-Norman barons to cross the channel with an army to force
the English king to fulfil the clauses of the charters he had granted
to his great vassals (1215–1216); on the other hand, the towns and
communes, grown rich and powerful, thanks to the privileges which had
been granted to them as well as to the intelligent activity of their
manufactures, forced the nobles to respect them. The latter no longer
attempted to compel assistance, but solicited it, often even humbly,
so that the communes and the landed aristocracy held an equal position
in the feudal hierarchy. The title of _noble_ and _baron_,
bestowed on the leading citizens of London and the Cinque Ports, raised
the middle-class to a higher position. Indeed, to enable it, already
powerful by its wealth and by its alliances, to become a political
body, it only needed the privilege of sending representatives to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account