Millbank; $b or, Roger Irving's ward. A novelHolmes, Mary Jane
Philosophy
Millbank; $b or, Roger Irving's ward. A novel
Holmes, Mary Jane
American fiction -- 19th century
There was no doubt about its being the genuine article, and the lawyer
waited a moment before opening it. There was perfect silence in the
room, except for the clock on the mantle, which ticked so loudly and
made Hester so nervous that she almost screamed aloud. The candles
sputtered a little, and ran up long, black wicks, and the fire on the
hearth cast weird shadows on the wall, and the silence was growing
oppressive, when Frank, who could endure no longer, pulled his mother’s
skirts, and exclaimed, “Mother, mother, what is he going to do, and why
don’t he do it? I want the darned thing over so I can go out.”
That broke the spell, and Lawyer Schofield began to read Squire Irving’s
last will and testament. It was dated five years before, at a time when
the Squire lay on his sick bed, from which he never expected to rise,
and not long after his purchase of the house on Lexington Avenue for
Mrs. Walter Scott. There was mention made of his deceased son having
received his entire portion, but the sum of four hundred dollars was
annually to be paid for Frank’s education until he was of age, when he
was to receive from the estate five thousand dollars to “set himself up
in business, provided that business had nothing to do with _horses_.”
The old man’s aversion to the rock on which his son had split was
manifest even in his will, but no one paid any heed to it then. They
were listening too eagerly to the reading of the document, which, after
remembering Frank, and leaving a legacy to the church in Belvidere, and
another to an orphan asylum in New York, and another to his servants,
with the exception of Aleck and Hester, gave the whole of the Irving
possessions, both real and personal, to the boy Roger, who was as far as
possible from realizing that he was the richest heir for miles and miles
around. He was feeling sorry that Frank had not fared better, and
wondering why Aleck and Hester had not been remembered. _They_ were
witnesses of the will, and there was no mistaking Hester’s straight up
and down letters, or Aleck’s back-hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account