where X stands for the mimetic factor and I for the factor which inhibits
the action of X. All males are heterozygous for I, but during the
segregation of characters at some stage in the formation of the families
only the male-producing sperms come to contain the factor I. It is lacking
in all the female-producing sperms formed by the male.
[M] (1) does not contain the factor for the mimetic condition and gives
only daughters of the M form when mated with an M[F]. [M] (2) on the
other hand is homozygous for the factor X, and consequently all of his germ
cells contain it. This is the male that gives nothing but mimetic daughters
with whatever form of female he is bred. [M] (3) is heterozygous for X;
that is to say, one half of his germ cells contain it, the other half not.
With the M[F] he must give equal numbers {87} of offspring with and
without X, _i.e._ half of his daughters will be mimetic and the other half
non-mimetic. With a heterozygous mimetic female (iiXx), which is also
producing germ cells with and without X in equal numbers, he may be
expected to give the usual result, viz. dominants and recessives in the
ratio 3:1; or in other words mimetic and non-mimetic females in the ratio
3:1.
One of Fryer's experiments may be given here in illustration of the nature
of the evidence upon which the above hypothesis depends.
H[F](wild) H[F](wild)
| |
+--------+----------+ +--+------+----------+
| | | | | |
18[M][M] 10M[F][F] 7H[F][F] 26[M][M] 7M[F][F] 26H[F][F]
| |
+---------+ +------+
| |
M[F] × [M]
|
+---------+
| |
7[M][M] 12H[F][F]
| |
+-----+ |
| \ |
| +---------+--------------+
| | \ |
[M] × H[F] ------------- [M] × H[F]
| |
+---------+--+-----+ +---------+----------+
| | | | | |
14[M][M] 6H[F][F] 1M[F] 8[M][M] 10H[F][F] 2M[F][F]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account