Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schoolsLuquer, Lea McIlvaine
Science
Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schools
Luquer, Lea McIlvaine
Petrology -- Laboratory manuals
_Microlites_, more or less completely defined microscopic crystals,
which usually show double refraction, but cannot be always specifically
determined, see Fig. 8, _a_.
_Skeleton Forms_, resulting from rapid cooling of the magma occur in
some lavas, see Fig. 8, _b_.
(_b_) ▄Color.▄ It must be remembered that the colors observed are always
due to transmitted light and may be called “_absorption tints_.”
Minerals which in hand specimens are opaque are often colored in
sections; and minerals which are commonly colored may appear colorless
in sections. At times color may be given to a section simply by the
presence of a great number of minute inclusions.
[Illustration:
FIG. 9.—Olivine crystal in basalt showing “high relief” and cleavage.
]
(_c_) ▄Index of Refraction.▄ _n_ = sin _i_/sin _r_. This can be
approximately determined by the appearance of the surface and outline of
a mineral, that is by its _relief_. The descriptive terms are of course
relative, but in common practice minerals are said to have _medium_
refraction when the refractive index is between that of balsam (1.54)
and that of calcite (1.60), _strong_ refraction when higher than 1.60
and _weak_ refraction when lower than 1.54. In the case of uniaxial and
biaxial minerals the mean value of the indices of refraction is used.
A mineral which has _strong refraction_ appears to have _high relief_,
_i. e._, distinct dark contours and a rough or “shagreened” surface,[31]
which has bright illumination and appears to stand out above the
surfaces of the surrounding minerals with weaker refraction, see Fig. 9.
A mineral with _medium refraction_ does not show any _relief_, hence has
a smooth surface and no dark contours, see Fig. 5.
A mineral with _weak refraction_ may also appear to have a rough
surface, but not so marked as in the case of a mineral with very strong
refraction, due to the smaller contrast in indices between the mineral
and balsam.
The practical way of testing for the approximate index of refraction or
the _relief_ of a mineral is to make use of the lens for convergent
light, which is placed on top of the lower nicol immediately below the
section.
By lowering[32] the lens the character of the relief of a mineral
section is made very apparent.
In order to become familiar with the way in which the “relief” or
appearance of the surface indicates the strength of the refractive
index, the student may use a long glass slide on which are embedded in
balsam (1.54) small fragments of different minerals, for example:
Sodalite (1.483), orthoclase (1.523), quartz (1.547), topaz (1.620),
hornblende (1.631), augite (1.70), epidote (1.751), zircon (1.95) and
rutile (2.712).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account