I own, however, and I am duly prepared to take the consequences of
the confession, that Flatman appeals to me, though in a different way,
almost as much as any other of the constituents of this volume, though
certainly not so much as some of those of the other two. He had the
pure misfortune--as the sternest critic must acknowledge it to have
been--of being born too late for one period and too early for another.
He could not give to his most serious things the 'brave translunary'
exaltations and excursions which came naturally to the men of a time
just before his, and he could not correct this want by the order and
the sense, the neatness and the finish, which were born with the next
generation. 'Death' and 'A Thought of Death' and the other things
mentioned unfairly but inevitably remind us that we have left Donne
and Crashaw, Vaughan, and even Herbert, behind us. 'The Mistake' and
'The Whim' and many others remind us that we have not come to Prior.
Yet others--which it were cruel to particularize and which he that
reads will easily find for himself--display a lack of the purely
lyrical power which, among his own contemporaries, Rochester and
Sedley and Aphra Behn, not to mention others, possessed. Nor had he
that gift of recognizing the eclipse of the Moon and utilizing the
opportunities of the Earth, which has made Dryden, to competent and
catholic tastes, all but one of the greatest of English poets. But
still he was a 'child of the Moon' herself; and he has the benefits
which she never withholds from her children, though they may be
accompanied by a disastrous influence. He was no doubt a minor poet
in a time when minor poetry was exposed to special disadvantages. But
with far less wit he was more of a poet than Cleveland; with far less
art he was perhaps as much of a poet as Stanley; and I am not even
sure that, with 'weight for age' in the due sense, he was so very much
less of a poet than King. And if those who think but little of these
others as poets deem this scanty praise let us go further and say that
he _is_ a poet--imperfect, disappointing as well as disappointed,
only half aneled with the sacred unction and houselled with the
divine food--but a poet. Which if any denies he may be 'an excellent
person'--as Praed or Praed's Medora so finally puts it--but he does
not know much, if indeed he knows anything, about poetry.[10]
[Footnote 1: By judicious remarks in the preface to his _Musa
Proterva_ (London, 1889, p. viii), and by specimens both in
that and in its companion, _Speculum Amantis_.]
[Footnote 2: In Ashmole MS. 436, at folio 50. Mr. J. K.
Fotheringham, who has kindly deciphered the horoscope, points
out that there are some inaccuracies in the astrologer's
computation, which 'leave a doubt of a few minutes'.]
[Footnote 3: Mr. Ernest Barker, Librarian of New College,
kindly gave Mr. Simpson access to the College records to test
the above dates and facts.]
[Footnote 4:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account