Great Britain -- History -- Poetry; Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Sources
In the same or following year after this revival an edition was
projected and executed by Wayland:[9]--a convincing evidence, as well
of the fashionable cast of reading, as of the rapid demand for that
work; otherwise even the rivalry of trade would never have hazarded
another edition, so soon after Tottell’s copies had supplied the market.
All the authors who joined in enlarging, or completing the part first
published of the _Mirrour_, have but slightly deviated from Lydgate’s
model, which was then secure in public approbation; and they therefore,
in some instances, may be suspected to have sacrificed genius and
imagination at the shrine of perverted taste, in order to obtain a
continuance of the same patronage. _The Mirrour for Magistrates_ was,
in fact, a common offspring of that class of historical literature,
which then flourished widely.[10] The addition of rhyme was the mere
variance of a minor ornament, rather than a change of its substantial
nature;[11] though many inferior productions, which its popularity
brought forth, seemed afterwards to give it the appearance of forming a
main class of our national poetry.[12]
From those historical stores were taken the principal incidents and
characters of the princes and nobles, whose vicious lives and tragical
ends made them conspicuous as moral examples; and as fit beacons to
check rebellion; a purpose which is ably attempted through the whole
work. Indeed, so little did any one of this combination of poets
venture fame, that novelty was neither attempted in subject, nor manner
of composition. The whole selection of matter was from chronicles in
universal circulation; as the seven-line stanza was adopted from their
precursor Lydgate; and, upon this last point, there may be added, that
it is doubtful if Higgins did not cancel two or three lives, first
published in another measure, for the advantage of substituting others,
to accord with the original plan and general taste.[13]
II. In the next division of inquiry as to the 'primary inventor’ of the
_Mirror for Magistrates_, the discussion arises from the unfounded
application of that term by Warton to that eminent genius THOMAS
SACKVILLE, afterwards created Lord Buckhurst and Earl of Dorset, and
which has been repeated, without examination, by subsequent writers.
It has been already stated, that the industry of Wayland effected much
in obtaining the contributory aid of the popular poets; nor must the
labour of FERRERS, who exerted himself in completing the original plan,
be left unnoticed; but still the general formation rests principally,
if not entirely, with BALDWIN. His claim to the air of novelty, so
successfully introduced for the purpose of connecting the whole as an
unbroken series, by an intermediate and apposite dialogue, has not
been disputed, any more than his finally completing the volume with an
introductory Epistle and Preface.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account