Miscellanies : $b embracing Nature, addresses, and lecturesEmerson, Ralph Waldo
Philosophy
Miscellanies : $b embracing Nature, addresses, and lectures
Emerson, Ralph Waldo
American essays -- 19th century; Philosophy of nature; Transcendentalism (New England)
But granting that for ends so sacred and dear, some relaxation must be
had, I think, that if a man find in himself any strong bias to poetry,
to art, to the contemplative life, drawing him to these things with a
devotion incompatible with good husbandry, that man ought to reckon
early with himself, and, respecting the compensations of the Universe,
ought to ransom himself from the duties of economy, by a certain rigor
and privation in his habits. For privileges so rare and grand, let him
not stint to pay a great tax. Let him be a cænobite, a pauper, and if
need be, celibate also. Let him learn to eat his meals standing, and to
relish the taste of fair water and black bread. He may leave to others
the costly conveniences of housekeeping, and large hospitality, and the
possession of works of art. Let him feel that genius is a hospitality,
and that he who can create works of art needs not collect them. He must
live in a chamber, and postpone his self-indulgence, forewarned and
forearmed against that frequent misfortune of men of genius,--the taste
for luxury. This is the tragedy of genius,--attempting to drive along
the ecliptic with one horse of the heavens and one horse of the earth,
there is only discord and ruin and downfall to chariot and charioteer.
The duty that every man should assume his own vows, should call the
institutions of society to account, and examine their fitness to him,
gains in emphasis, if we look at our modes of living. Is our
housekeeping sacred and honorable? Does it raise and inspire us, or does
it cripple us instead? I ought to be armed by every part and function of
my household, by all my social function, by my economy, by my feasting,
by my voting, by my traffic. Yet I am almost no party to any of these
things. Custom does it for me, gives me no power therefrom, and runs me
in debt to boot. We spend our incomes for paint and paper, for a hundred
trifles, I know not what, and not for the things of a man. Our expense
is almost all for conformity. It is for cake that we run in debt; ’tis
not the intellect, not the heart, not beauty, not worship, that costs so
much. Why needs any man be rich? Why must he have horses, fine
garments, handsome apartments, access to public houses and places of
amusement? Only for want of thought. Give his mind a new image, and he
flees into a solitary garden or garret to enjoy it, and is richer with
that dream, than the fee of a county could make him. But we are first
thoughtless, and then find that we are moneyless. We are first sensual,
and then must be rich. We dare not trust our wit for making our house
pleasant to our friend, and so we buy ice-creams. He is accustomed to
carpets, and we have not sufficient character to put floor cloths out of
his mind whilst he stays in the house, and so we pile the floor with
carpets. Let the house rather be a temple of the Furies of Lacedæmon,
formidable and holy to all, which none but a Spartan may enter or so
much as behold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account