Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since ComteGunn, John Alexander
Philosophy
Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since Comte
Gunn, John Alexander
Philosophy, French; Philosophy, Modern
[32] Reproduced in 1894 in the _Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale_.
Ravaisson’s chief title to fame, however, lies in his famous
philosophic manifesto of 1867, for such, in fact, was his _Rapport sur
la Philosophie en France au XIXè Siècle_. This Report, prepared for the
_Exposition universelle_ at the request of the Ministry of Education,
marks an epoch, for with it began the current of thought which was to
dominate the close of the century. The “manifesto” was a call to free
spirits to assert themselves in favour of a valid idealism. It, in
itself, laid the foundations of such a philosophy and dealt a blow to
both the Eclectic School of Cousin and the followers of Auguste Comte.
Ravaisson wrote little, but his influence was powerful and made itself
felt in the University, where in his office of president of the
_agrégation en philosophie_ he exercised no little influence over the
minds of younger men. His pupils, among whom are to be found Lachelier,
Boutroux and Bergson, have testified to the profound and inspiring
influence which this thinker exercised. A notable tribute to his memory
is the address given by Bergson when he was appointed to take
Ravaisson’s place at the _Académie des Sciences morales et politiques_
in 1904.
Various influences meet in Ravaisson and determine his general attitude
to thought. He reverts, as we have said, to Maine de Biran, whose
insistence upon the inner life he approves. We must examine human
consciousness and make it our basis. We have in it powers of will, of
desire and of love. Ravaisson blends the Aristotelian insistence upon
Thought with the Christian insistence upon Love. In his method he
manifests the influence of the German philosopher, Schelling, whose
lectures he attended at Munich in company with the young Swiss thinker,
Secretan.[33] This influence is seen in his doctrine of synthesis and
his intellectual intuition. Science continues to give us analyses ever
more detailed, but it cannot lead us to the absolute. Our highest, most
sublime knowledge is gained by a synthesis presented in and to our
consciousness, an intuition. Further, he argues that efficient causes,
about which science has so much to say, are really dependent upon final
causes. Spiritual reality is anterior to material reality, and is
characterised by goodness and beauty. Himself an artist, imbued with a
passionate love of the beautiful (he was guardian of sculptures at the
Louvre), he constructs a philosophy in the manner of an artist. Like
Guyau, he writes metaphysics like poetry, and although he did not give
us anything like _Vers d’un Philosophe_, he would have endorsed the
remarks which Guyau made on the relation of poetry and philosophy if,
indeed, it is not a fact that his influence inspired the younger man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account