Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since ComteGunn, John Alexander
Philosophy
Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since Comte
Gunn, John Alexander
Philosophy, French; Philosophy, Modern
The notion of freedom and of the spontaneity of the spirit became
watchwords of the new spiritualist philosophers. Under the work and
influence of Boutroux (1845-1921) these ideas were further emphasised
and worked out more definitely to a position which assumes a critical
attitude to the dogmatism of modern science and establishes a
contingency in all things. Boutroux’s thesis _De la Contingence des
Lois de la Nature_ appeared in 1874 and was dedicated to Ravaisson. His
chief fame and his importance in the development of the spiritualist
philosophy rest upon this book alone. In 1894 he published a course of
lectures given at the Sorbonne in 1892-3, _Sur l’Idée de Loi
naturelle_, which supplements the thesis. Outside his own country
attention has been more readily bestowed upon his writings on the
history of philosophy, of which subject he was Professor. In his own
country, however, great interest and value are attached to his work on
_The Contingency of the Laws of Nature_. In this Boutroux combines the
attitude of Ravaisson with that of Lachelier. The totality of the laws
of the universe manifests, according to him, a contingency. No
explanation of these laws is possible apart from a free spiritual
activity. The stress laid upon contingency in the laws of nature
culminates in the belief in the freedom of man.
The critique of science which marked Boutroux’s work has profoundly
influenced thinkers like Hannequin, Payot and Milhaud,[40] and in the
following century appears in the work of Duhem and of Henri Poincaré,
the noted mathematician, whose books on _La Science et l’Hypothèse_
(1902), _La Valeur de la Science_ (1905), and _Science et Méthode_
(1909) have confirmed many of Boutroux’s conclusions.[41]
[40] Hannequin’s notable work is the _Essai critique sur L’Hypothèse
des Atomes_ (1896). Payot’s chief book is _La Croyance_ (1896).
Milhaud’s critique of science is contained in his _Essai sur les
Conditions et les Limites de la Certitude logique_ (1894), and in _Le
Rationnel_ (1898). Duhem’s book is _La Théorie physique_ (1906).
[41] It is interesting to note that Boutroux married Poincaré’s
sister, and that his son, Pierre Boutroux, whose education was guided
by both his uncle and his father, is now Professor at the Collège de
France. Emile Boutroux was a pupil of Zeller, whose lectures on Greek
philosophy he attended in Heidelberg, 1868. He expressed to the writer
his grief at the later prostitution of German thought to nationalist
and materialist aims. He was Professor of the History of Philosophy in
Paris from 1888, then Honorary Professor of Modern Philosophy. In 1914
he gave the Hertz Lecture to the British Academy on _Certitude et
Vérité_. He was until his death Directeur de la Fondation Thiers, a
college for post-graduate study, literary, philosophical and
scientific.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account