Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since ComteGunn, John Alexander
Philosophy
Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since Comte
Gunn, John Alexander
Philosophy, French; Philosophy, Modern
He bears out his view of _idées-forces_ by showing how a state of
consciousness tries to realise its object. The idea of movement is
closely bound up with the physiological and physical action, and,
moreover, tends to produce it. This realisation is not a merely
mechanistic process but is teleological and depends on the vital unity
between the physical and the mental. On this fundamental notion
Fouillée constructs his psychology, his ethic, his sociology and his
metaphysic. He sees in the evolutionary process ideas at work which
tend to realise themselves. One of these is the idea of freedom, in
which idea he endeavours to find a true reconciliation of the problem
of determinism in science and the demands of the human spirit which
declares itself free. The love of freedom arising from the idea of
freedom creates in the long run this freedom. This is Fouillée’s method
all through. “To conceive and to desire the ideal is already to begin
its realisation.” He applies his method with much success in the realm
of ethics and sociology where he opposes to the Marxian doctrine of a
materialist determination of history that of a spiritual and
intellectual determination by ideas. Fouillée’s philosophy is at once
intellectual and voluntarist. He has himself described it as
“spiritualistic voluntarism.” It is a system of idealism which reflects
almost all the elements of modern thought. In places his doctrine of
reconciliation appears to break down, and the psychological law summed
up in _idées-forces_ is hardly sufficient to bear the vast erection
which Fouillée builds upon it. The idea is nevertheless a valuable and
fruitful one. Fouillée’s respect for positive science is noteworthy, as
is also his great interest in social problems.[47]
[47] At the end of the century these problems received highly
specialised attention in the work of the sociologists inspired by
Comte’s influence. Works of special merit in this direction are:
tspmas, with his _Société’s animales_ (1876) and Tarde, predecessor of
Bergson at the Collège de France (1843-1907), with his _Criminalité
comparée_ (1898) and _Les Lois de l’Imitation_ (1900), also Durkheim’s
work _De la Division du Travail social_ (1893) and _Les Régles de la
Méthode sociologique_ (1894), and Izoulet, with his _La Cité moderne_
(1894). Note those of Levy-Bruhl, Bouglé, and Le Bon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account