These dialectic forms demand consideration for the reason that some of
the derivations proposed take as their starting-point not the common
form καλλικάντζαρος but one of the rarer by-forms--a method which is
evidently open to objection when it is seen, as the accompanying table
of forms will show, that καλλικάντζαρος, besides being the common
and normal form, is also the centre from which all the dialectic
varieties radiate in different directions. In compiling my list of
forms, however, I may abbreviate it by the omission of those which are
a matter of calligraphic rather than of phonetic distinction. Thus
the first two syllables of καλλικάντζαρος are often written καλι- or
καλη-, but since ι and η represent exactly the same sound and λλ is
very seldom distinguished from λ, I have uniformly written καλλι- even
where my authority for the particular form uses some other spelling.
On the other hand, as regards the use of τζ or τσ, between which there
is a real if somewhat subtle difference in sound, I have retained the
particular form which I have found recorded.
Starting then from the normal form καλ-λι-κάν-τζα-ρος, which I thus
dismember for convenience of reference to its five syllables, I may
classify the changes which the word undergoes in various dialects as
follows:
(1) The insertion of α in the second syllable, giving λι̯α in the place
of λι.
(2) The prefixing of σ to the first syllable, giving σκαλ for καλ. With
this Bernhard Schmidt well compares the modern σκόνη for κόνις, and
σκύφτω for κύπτω.
(3) The complete suppression of the second syllable, or the retention
of the ι only as a faintly pronounced y.
(4) Combined with, and consequent upon, the suppression of the
second syllable, the change of λ to ρ in the first syllable, or the
interchange of the λ in the first syllable with the ρ in the fifth.
(5) The loss of either ν in the third syllable or τ in the fourth.
(6) The change of the α in the first syllable to ο.
(7) The change of the α in the third syllable to ε, ι, ο, or ου.
Instances of this are most frequent in combination with the changes
under (4).
(8) The interchange of the κ in the third syllable with the τζ (or τσ)
in the fourth. The νκ thus produced becomes γγ.
(9) The formation of diminutive neuter forms ending in -ι instead of
the masculine forms in -ος, with the consequent shift of accent from
the third to the fourth syllable, the -ι representing -ιον. These
neuter forms occur chiefly in the plural.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account