Since the Callicantzari bear the name of the Centaurs, it is obvious
that the enquiry must be carried yet further back, and that the ancient
ideas concerning the Centaurs’ origin must be investigated. Pindar
touches often upon the Centaur-myths; what view did he take of the
Centaurs’ nature? Were they divine in origin or human? We shall see
that he held no settled view on the subject. Both traditions concerning
the origin of the Centaurs were familiar to him just as both traditions
still prevail in modern accounts of the Callicantzari; sometimes he
follows the one, sometimes the other. On the one hand the Centaur
Chiron is consistently described as divine. ‘Fain would I,’ says
Pindar[627], ‘that Chiron ... wide-ruling scion of Cronos the son of
Ouranos were living and not gone, and that the Beast of the wilds were
ruling o’er the glens of Pelion’; and again he names him ‘Chiron son
of Cronos[628]’ and ‘the Beast divine[629].’ In Pindar’s view Chiron,
be he Beast or God, is certainly not human; and if he is once named
by the same poet ‘the Magnesian Centaur[630],’ the epithet need only
perhaps declare his habitation. His divinity is plainly asserted, and
the legend that he resigned the divine guerdon of immortality in order
to deliver Prometheus accords with Pindar’s doctrine.
But on the other hand the story of Ixion as told by Pindar reveals
another tradition. Ixion himself was human; for his presumptuous sin of
lusting after the wife of Zeus ‘swiftly he suffered as he, mere man,
deserved, and won a misery unique[631].’ The son of Ixion therefore
by a nebulous mother could not be divine. The cloud wherewith in
his delusion he had mated ‘bare unto him, unblest of the Graces, a
monstrous son, a thing apart even as she, with no rank either among
men or where gods have their portion; him she nurtured and named
Centauros; and he in the dales of Pelion did mate with Magnesian mares,
and thence there sprang a wondrous warrior-tribe like unto both their
parents--like to their dams in their nether parts, and the upper frame
their sire’s[632].’ The first Centaur then, the founder of the race,
though only half-human in origin, was in no respect divine. How then
came Chiron, one of that race, to be divine? The two traditions are
inconsistent. Pindar as a poet was not troubled thereby; he chose now
the one, now the other, for his art to embroider. But in the science
of mythology the discrepancy of the two traditions is important. Once
more we must carry our search further back--to Hesiod and to Homer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive