The former, in placing the battle of the Lapithae and the Centaurs
among the scenes wrought on the shield of Heracles[633], says never a
word to suggest that either set of combatants were other than human;
the contrast between them lies wholly in the weapons they use. The
Lapithae have their leaders enumerated, Caineus, Dryas, Pirithous,
and the rest; the Centaurs in like manner are gathered about their
Chieftains, ‘huge Petraeos and Asbolos the augur and Arctos and Oureios
and black-haired Mimas and the two sons of Peukeus, Perimedes and
Dryalos.’ The account reads like a description of a fight between two
tribes, one of them equipped with body-armour and using spears, the
other more primitive and armed only with rude wooden weapons.
To this representation of the Centaurs Homer also, in the _Iliad_,
consents; for, though he names them Pheres or ‘Beasts,’ it is quite
clear that this is the proper name of a tribe of men--men who dwelt
on Mount Pelion and were hardly less valiant than the heroes who
conquered them. ‘Never saw I,’ says Nestor, ‘nor shall see other such
men as were Pirithous and Dryas, shepherd of hosts, and Caineus and
Exadios and godlike Polyphemus and Theseus, son of Aegeus, like unto
the immortals. Mightiest in sooth were they of men upon the earth,
and against mightiest fought, even the mountain-haunting Pheres,
and fearfully they did destroy them[634].’ And again we hear how
Pirithous ‘took vengeance on the shaggy Pheres, and drave them forth
from Pelion to dwell nigh unto the Aethices[635].’ Apart from the name
‘Pheres,’ which will shortly be examined, there is nothing in these
passages any more than in that of Hesiod to suggest that the conflict
of the Lapithae and the Centaurs means anything but the destruction
or expulsion of a primitive and wild mountain-tribe by a people who,
in the wearing of body-armour, had advanced one important step in
material civilisation. Yet in some respects the tribe of Centaurs
were, according to Homer, at least the equals of their neighbours; for
Chiron, ‘the justest of the Centaurs[636],’ was the teacher both of
the greatest warrior, Achilles[637], and of the greatest physician,
Asclepios[638]. The only passage of Homer which has been held to imply
that the Centaurs were not men comes not from the _Iliad_ but from the
_Odyssey_[639]--ἐξ οὗ Κενταύροισι καὶ ἀνδράσι νεῖκος ἐτύχθη--which Miss
Harrison[640] translates ‘Thence ’gan the feud ’twixt Centaurs and
mankind,’ inferring therefrom the non-humanity of the Centaurs. It is
however legitimate to take the word ἀνδράσι in a stricter sense, and to
render the line, ‘Thence arose the feud between Centaurs and heroes,’
to wit, the heroes Pirithous, Dryas, and others; and the inference is
then impaired. But in any case the _Iliad_, the earlier authority,
consistently depicts both Chiron and the other Centaurs as human. The
tradition of a divine origin must have arisen between the date of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account