Greek religion differed from the chief now existing religions of the
world in its origin and development. It had no founder. Its sanction
was not the _ipse dixit_ of some inspired teacher. It possessed nothing
analogous to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, or the Koran. It was a
free, autochthonous growth, evolved from the various hopes and fears
of a whole people. If we could catch a glimpse of it in its infancy,
we should probably deny to it the very name of religion, and call it
superstition or folklore. Great teachers indeed arose, like Orpheus,
advocating special doctrines and imposing upon their followers special
rules of life. Great centres of religious influence were developed,
such as Delphi, exercising a general control over rites and ceremonies.
But no single preacher, no priesthood, succeeded in dominating over
the free conscience of the people. Nothing was imposed by authority.
In belief and in worship each man was a law unto himself; and so far
as there were any accepted doctrines and established observances,
these were not the subtle inventions of professional theologians or
an interested priesthood, but were based upon the hereditary and
innate convictions of the whole Greek race. The individual was free to
believe what he would and what he could; it was the general, if vague,
consensus of the masses which constituted the real religion of Greece.
The _vox populi_ fully established itself as the _vox dei_.
Again in this popular religion, when it had emerged from its earliest
and crudest form and had reached the definitely anthropomorphic stage
in which we know it, we can discern no trace of any tendency towards
monotheism. The idea of a single supreme deity, personal or impersonal,
appealed only to some of the greatest thinkers: the mass of the people
remained frankly polytheistic. For this reason the development of
Greek religion proceeded on very different lines from that of Hebrew
religion. The earliest Jewish conception of a God ‘walking in the
garden in the cool of the day’ was certainly no less anthropomorphic
than the Homeric presentation of the Olympian deities: but the
subsequent growth of Judaism was like that of some tall straight palm
tree lifting its head to purer air than is breathed by men; whereas
Greek religion resembled rather the cedar spreading wide its branches
nearer the earth. The Jew, by concentrating in one unique being every
transcendent quality and function, exalted gradually his idea of
godhead far above the anthropomorphic plane: the Greek multiplied
his gods to be the several incarnations of passions and powers and
activities pertaining also, though in less fulness, to mankind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account