Schopenhauer, iv, 154; “World as Will,” 158-161; on universal strife, 162-167; forerunners, 167, 168; followers, 168, 169; on suicide, 169, 170; on the beautiful, 170-172; on civil law, 172-173; on moral intuition, 173-175; on denial of will, 175-178; on Nirvana, 178-181; and Nietzsche, 186-193; 313, 314. Schopp, letter describing Bruno’s trial and execution, 31-34. Spinoza, iv; family, life, death, 39; and Bruno, 39, 40; and Descartes, 40-46; on popular theology, 46-51; _ein Gottrunkener_, 52; purpose and freedom, 53-55; knowledge goodness, happiness, 55-63; 104, 187, 310, 311. suicide, Schopenhauer on, 169-170. superman, iv, 195, 196, 205, 208. super-superman, iv, 208. sympathy, Hume on, 126; Schopenhauer on, 173-175; Nietzsche on, see pity. Tasso, 259, 263. teleology, see purpose. Tennant, 300. tragedy, Schopenhauer’s conception of, 158, 168, 169. Typees, of Melville, 251-253. Ulysses, morality of, 265. utility, Hume on, 125; “Why Pleases,” 126. Van den Ende, Francis, 41. Venice, Bruno before tribunal at, 9-18. will, to live, see Schopenhauer; to power, see Nietzsche; to believe, see pragmatism. Xenophanes, 186, 309. FOOTNOTES [1] This would be Saturday afternoon. [2] A curious ignorance of the content of the “Spaccio!” There are numerous other faults of detail in this account. [3] Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, XII. [4] This image of the Old Testament World is not of course supposed to be that of the ancient Hebrews. Rather does it represent this world as reflected in the thought of a modern Christian community. [5] The individuating quality of love is again discussed in Chap. X, on “Love and Loyalty.” [6] The exact wording: “Handle so, dass die Maxime deines Willens jederzeit zugleich als Princip einer allgemeinen Gesetzgebung gelten könne.” K. d. p. V., 1, 1, 1. [7] Cf: “In der ganzen Schöpfung kann alles was man will, und vorüber man etwas vermag, auch _bloss als Mittel_ gebraucht werden; nur der Mensch ... _Ist Zweck an sich selbst_.... Eben um dieser willen ist jeder Wille ... auf die Bedingung der Einstimmung mit der _Autonomie_ des vernünftigen Wesens eingeschränkt, es nämlich keiner Absicht zu unterwerfen, die nicht nach einem Gesetze, welches aus dem Willen des leidenden Subjects selbst entspringen könnte, möglich ist....” K. d. p. V., 1, 1, 3. [8] Pierre Louÿs. [9] Royce. [10] Abridged. [11] Abridged. [12] Gesammelte Briefe, p. 61. [13] Ibid., p. 170. [14] Pragmatism, p. 104. [15] Anatole France. [16] The meaning and value of “loyalty” is more fully discussed in Chap. X, on “Love and Loyalty.”