Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its history — John Shaqi
Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its historySinger, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophy
Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its history
Singer, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophers; Philosophy -- History
“Now Bruno was that Nolan ... a professed Dominican who some
twenty-three years agone began to doubt of Transubstantiation ...
then forthright to deny it, and likewise the virginity of the Blessed
Mary. He migrated to Geneva, ... whence, not approving himself
altogether sound in his Calvinism (than which, nevertheless, nothing
leads straighter to atheism), he was driven to Lyons, whence to
Toulouse, from whence he passed on to Paris, where he was a professor,
but extraordinarius, as he found that the professor ordinarius was
obliged to attend Mass. Thence to London, where he published a little
book called the ‘Beast Triumphant,’ meaning thereby the Pope, whom
your party is wont to honor with the name of beast.[2] From here to
Wittenberg, where, if I am not mistaken, he lectured publicly for two
years. Having gone on to Prague, he published there the works, ‘On the
Boundless,’ ‘On the Innumerable Worlds,’ and yet one other, ‘On the
Shadows of Ideas,’ in which he taught horrible and moreover most absurd
things, as that there are innumerable worlds, that the soul passes from
one body into another, ... that magic is a good thing and permissible,
the Holy Spirit is nothing but the soul of the world, and that this
was what Moses meant when he wrote, ‘The spirit of God moved on the
face of the waters,’ that the world is eternal.... In a word, whatever
is asserted by the Pagan philosophers, whatever by our older or newer
heretics he (Bruno) maintained.
“From Prague he went on to Brunswick and Helmstadt, and there for a
time is said to have taught. Then to Frankfurt for the publishing
of certain books, and later fell into the hands of the Inquisition
at Venice, whence when they had had enough of him, he was sent to
Rome. Frequently examined by the Holy Office ... of the Inquisition,
convicted by the highest theologians, he now besought eighty days that
he might consider, now promised recantation, now defended his point
anew, now obtained another eighty days; but was really doing nothing
but make a fool of the Pontiff and the Inquisition.
“So that, nearly eight years after he had come before the Inquisition
here, on the ninth of February in the Palace of the Grand Inquisitor,
there being present the Most Illustrious Cardinals of the Holy Office
of the Inquisition, ... theologians of counsel, and the secular
magistrate, governor of the city, Bruno was brought in, and on bended
knees heard sentence pronounced against him. And it was in this way:
the story of his life was told, of his studies and teachings, and with
what diligence and fraternal admonishment the Inquisition had sought to
effect his conversion, and what obduracy and impiety he had shown. Then
they defrocked him, as we say, and straightway excommunicated him and
handed him over to the secular arm to be punished, asking that this be
done with clemency and without the shedding of blood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account