Modest Remarks upon the Bishop of London's Letter Concerning the Late Earthquakes — John Shaqi
Modest Remarks upon the Bishop of London's Letter Concerning the Late EarthquakesAnonymous
Religion
Modest Remarks upon the Bishop of London's Letter Concerning the Late Earthquakes
Anonymous
Sherlock, Thomas, 1678-1761
But thou hast not only, Friend, mistaken the proper Use of thy Text, but
in the Improvement of it thou hast left unsaid many things that ought
naturally to have occurred to thee, whether thou supposedst the Shocks to
be the Effect of a special or a general Providence. Verily, Friend, on
such an awful Occasion, I expected, that thou wouldest have enumerated,
without any palliation or disguise, the many heinous Sins, that in this
wicked Age are even a Disgrace to Human Nature, and, after such an
Enumeration, thou wouldest candidly, and without Respect of Persons, have
pointed out the real Source of all these Iniquities that overwhelm the
Land, and have directed thy Flock to the natural Means of freeing
themselves from the Thraldom of Sin and Death. But in all this verily thou
hast fallen short: For in the List of the Crimes, with which thou hast
charged the People, thou hast forgot the most atrocious, and taken notice
of the most trivial of our Transgressions, and hast missed intirely of the
true Source of our growing Impiety, and left us altogether in the dark as
to the Practical Method of _amending our ways, and turning again unto the
God of our Fore fathers_.
The First Sin thou takest Notice of, and what, by the Order in which thou
hast placed it, and the Conclusion thou hast drawn from it, would appear
in thy Sense the Source of all our publick and private Transgressions, is
the Number of bad Books with which the Town swarms. This indeed is a
crying Sin, and much to be lamented: but, great as it is, it does not
deserve to lead the Van in a List of National Sins, capable of drawing
down the special Vengeance of the Almighty upon a whole People. Nor is its
Influence so great, as to corrupt the Morals of the Generality of the
Nation. Nine Parts in Ten never read Books of any Sort; and those, that
do, would make but a small Proficiency in Vice, if they had no other
School to learn it in, but Books and unclean Pictures. It is true, Friend,
there are a great many impious Books, and indecent Prints, publickly sold
in our Streets; and they may have their Share in debauching the Morals of
the People: but I would have thee to reflect, that there have been Periods
of Time, when that Evil was more to be complained of than at present. I
verily believe, that there are not the Hundredth Part of irreligious Books
now printed, as were in the Reign of _Charles_ II. There is so little of
the Spirit of Religion now prevailing, that the Subject, even when spoken
of in ridicule, is disagreeable to the Polite of the present Age. But when
thou wast speaking of bad Books, there is one thing thou mightest have
mentioned with as much Propriety as Part of the Sins of the Times; that
is, the Want of good Books, the only proper Antidote against the Venom of
those thou so bitterly complainest against: The Age has not only produced
fewer bad Books, than some former; but it has been likewise remarkably
deficient in producing any thing fit to improve the Morals or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account