guided thee to a better faith than it,” Mohammed gladly answered.
Two dispatches were probably sent to Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium,
who had just completed a victorious struggle with Persia. The first
one, which requested him to cease the idolatrous worship of Jesus
and His Mother, to reverence the one true God, and to recognize
the mission of Mohammed, was apparently disregarded; a second
message, couched in like terms, prompted a vassal of Heraclius to
request permission to punish the insolent pretender who sent it, but
Heraclius forbade any needless expedition against the contemptible
person who had audaciously signed himself “Mohammed the Apostle of
God.” The King of Persia, on receiving a similar note, merely tore
it up; and the Prophet, on hearing of this outrage, prayed aloud:
“Even thus, O Lord! rend thou his kingdom from him!” It may be
presumed that neither Heraclius nor the Persian King even suspected
that, within a decade or two, their mighty empires would be paying
tribute to Islam. A letter that Mohammed sent to Ruayyah, of Suhaim,
was treated more respectfully than the one that had been dispatched
to the Persian monarch; for Ruayyah used it to mend a hole in his
water-skin. Another powerful chief, having listened to Mohammed’s
delegate, instructed him to carry back this message: “How excellent
is that Revelation to which thou invitest me, and how beautiful!
Know that I am the Poet of my tribe, and an Orator. The Arabs revere
my dignity. Grant unto me, therefore, a share in the rule, and I
will follow thee.” The Prophet, on being informed of this, snarled:
“Had this man asked of me but an unripe date, as his share in the
land, I would not have given it. Let him perish, and his vainglory
with him!”--and it is confidently stated that the presumptuous snob
did, in fact, die within a year. The Roman Governor of Egypt, too,
refused to endorse Mohammed’s claims--“I am aware,” he said, “that
a prophet is yet to arise; but I am of opinion that he will appear
in Syria”--yet he atoned for his stubbornness of heart by sending
Mohammed a double present in the form of a white mule and a black
concubine.
Mohammed, meanwhile, was showing his interest in his recent converts
by altering their Pagan names to titles that better suited his almost
feminine fondness for daintily euphemistic words. For example,
“Zeid of the Stud” right gladly abandoned his plebeian appellation
when he was rechristened “Zeid of the Good”; “the Wolf, son of the
Cub,” was similarly glorified by becoming “Allah’s Servant”; and an
“Oppressor” suffered a welcome sea-change into a “Well-doer.” But
when a tribe called the “Sons of Bastardy” were politely accosted
as the “Sons of Chastity,” they announced their steadfast desire
to remain true to their ancient heritage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account