Great Britain -- History -- Charles II, 1660-1685 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
“_Could_ you?” she said. “Then you’d be a blind donkey for your
pains.” She came up and stood before him, her chin raised, her hands
clasped behind her back. “So you’re Lord Chesterfield,” she said. “How
do you like it?”
“How do you?” he asked, grinning.
“H’m!” she said critically, bringing one hand forward to fondle her
baby chin. “’Tis early days to say. But, on the face of you, you look
very much like any other man. But perhaps you’re different
underneath--made of gold, like the boys in the folk-tale.”
“O! I’m not made of gold, I can assure you.”
“Aren’t you, now? I’ve heard of some that are said to be.”
“I’m made just like anybody else.”
“There, now! What a disappointment! And you call yourself a lord!”
“Why, how would you have me?”
“I wouldn’t have you at all. What a question from a married man!”
He was a little vexed; he made that sound of impatience between tongue
and palate which cannot be rendered in spelling.
“I see you’re a literal soul,” said he. “I must be careful how I put
things.”
“You’d better,” she said. “Now I come to look at you, you’ve got a
sinful eye.”
“And now I come to look at you, I don’t wonder at it.”
“Don’t you? Well, for all you’re like to get, you may put it in there
and see none the worse.”
He laughed, a little astounded. “Troth!” thought he; “this is a
strange acquaintance for Kate to have made!”
“Why,” he said, “what have I asked or expected but the right of every
man to see and admire?”
“O! you may admire as much as you like,” quoth she. “I wouldn’t
deprive you of that gratification.”
“Or yourself, perhaps?”
“No!” she said, with indifference; “you needn’t consider me. I’ve more
than I can do with already.”
“What!” he said, “but not of the town quality? ’Tis only sheep’s-eyes
they make at you in the country.”
“All’s fish, for that, that comes to a woman’s net. ’Tis a question
with her more of quantity than quality.”
He shrugged his shoulders.
“Do you love the country?”
“Sure,” she said. “I love the pigs and the cows and the horses, and
the ducks and the geese; but, after all, there’s no goose like a
lord.”
He laughed, but a little uneasily. He was not quite so confident as he
had been of the simple nature of his task. He would just like, for an
experiment, to eschew badinage, and insinuate a thought more feeling
into the conversation.
“I think I agree with you,” he said. “A lord is a goose.”
“Unless he’s a gander,” said she.
“You called him a goose,” he answered with asperity; “and a goose he
shall be.”
“Well, don’t quarrel about it,” she protested. “Goose and gander and
gosling, they say, are three sounds but one thing. Why is a
lord--whichever he is?”
“Well, what was _your_ reason for calling him a goose?”
“I never did. I said there was no goose like him.”
“That was to flatter the goose, I think.”
“Was it, now? And I meant it to flatter the lord.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account