Monophysitism Past and Present: A Study in Christology — John Shaqi
Monophysitism Past and Present: A Study in ChristologyLuce, A. A. (Arthur Aston)
Religion
Monophysitism Past and Present: A Study in Christology
Luce, A. A. (Arthur Aston)
Monophysites
Those men, to whom God is the sum of all reality and the world merely a
cosmic shadow, regard worship as the sole worthy activity of the human
spirit. In worship union with God is sought, a union so close that the
personality of the worshipper is absorbed into the being of the
worshipped. His experience of God is so intimate that his experience
of the world is reduced to insignificance. As an overpowering human
love welds two beings into one, and identifies their thoughts, wills,
springs of action and even feelings, so the _amor dei_ identifies man
with God and makes possible a deification of humanity. Deeply
religious natures in all ages have heard this mystic call. To lose
their ego in the divine spirit is the height of their religious
ambition. The conception is lofty, but it is not the Christian ideal
of life and duty.
Mysticism and monophysitism are twin systems. Both are religious
phases of pantheism. As, to the intellect, acosmism is the corollary
of pantheism, so, to the heart, asceticism follows from mysticism.
Whether conceived in terms of existence or of value, the world for the
mystic is an obstacle to the _unio mystica_. It snares the mind
through the senses and creates a fictitious -appearance of solid
reality in sensuous objects. It makes pretensions to goodness and
attaches to itself a spurious value. The only remedy is self-denial,
denial of existence to the world, denial of credence to the senses,
denial of gratification to the passions, desires, and inclinations.
The monophysites were mystics. They were the rigorists of the eastern
church. They formed the "no compromise" party. They stood for a
thorough-going renunciation of the world and the flesh. Though they
did not officially lay down the inherent evil of matter, Manicheanism
is latent in their system. They did not explicitly identify matter
with the spirit of evil, but they had the spiritual man's suspicion of
matter and his contempt for the body of the flesh. Abstinence,
mortification of the flesh, and all ascetic practices flourished in
their communion. Art and culture were suspect; they had no eye for
natural beauty. Some of their hymn-writers possessed considerable
poetic taste; but poetry was discouraged by their leaders. Several of
the extant letters of Severus of Antioch show that that patriarch did
his best to banish that art from his church. His attitude may be
gathered from the following quotation.[1] "As to Martyrius, the poet,
... I wish you to know that he is a trouble to me and a nuisance.
Indeed in the case of the others also who follow the same profession,
and were enrolled in the holy clergy of the Church that is with us, I
have debarred them from practising such poetry; and I am taking much
trouble to sever this theatrical pursuit from ecclesiastical gravity
and modesty, a pursuit that is the mother of laxity and is also capable
of causing youthful souls to relax and casting them into the mire of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account