The true drama of Julius Cæsar is indicated by Plutarch. It is Cæsar’s
triumph over innumerable difficulties, any one of which might have been
fatal, the protection by his genius, the limitation of its power, the
Dictatorship—‘Semideus,’ his death. Shakespeare gives no reason, nor
does Plutarch, why Brutus should have plotted to kill Cæsar, excepting
the fear of what might happen if he were to become absolute. Brutus is
abstract.
‘Such one he was (of him we boldly say),
In whose rich soule all sovereigne powres did sute,
In whom in peace the elements all lay
So mixt, as none could soveraigntie impute;
As all did govern, yet all did obey;
His lively temper was so absolute,
That ’t seem’d, when heaven his modell first began,
In him it show’d perfection in a man.’
This is Drayton’s imitation of what Antony says of Brutus, and it is one
which not only does not spoil the original, but is itself original.
* * * * *
_Antony and Cleopatra_.—It is not Antony’s passion for Cleopatra which
ruins him. He has not the cohesion which obtains success. He is
loose-bonded. Cæsar is his complete foil and contrast. Cæsar exists
dramatically to explain Antony. Antony’s challenge to single combat and
the speeches he makes to his servants are characteristic. The marriage
to Octavia, more than his Egyptian slavery, shows his weakness. There is
a line in Plutarch which I wish Shakespeare had used. ‘But it was in the
nature of Antonius to show his best qualities in difficulties, and in his
misfortune he was as like as may be to a good man.’
Scenes 6 and 7, Act ii., the interview with Pompey, are in Plutarch, but
it is not evident why they are in the drama. They do not advance the
action. Shakespeare preserves also Antony’s message to Octavius that if
he was dissatisfied with the treatment of Thyreus he might hang or
torture Antony’s freedman Hipparchus—a detestable piece of brutality
which might well have been omitted.
Cleopatra is quite apart from Shakespeare’s other women. She is a most
complicated and difficult study. Shakespeare takes over from Plutarch
her wandering disguised through the streets at night with Antony; the
voyage down the Cydnus; the hanging of the salt fish on Antony’s hook;
the flight at Actium; the fact that she was mistress of Julius Cæsar and
Cnæus Pompey; the second betrayal of the fleet; her petition to Octavius
for her son; and her attempt to cheat Octavius in the account of her
treasures. In addition Shakespeare makes her ‘hop forty paces through
the public street.’ What could have induced him to invent this story?
She threatens Charmian with bloody teeth; lets Thyreus kiss her hand,
arousing thereby Antony’s rage. Thyreus tells her that Cæsar knows she
did not embrace Antony from love but from fear, and she replies:
‘He is a god, and knows
What is most right: mine honour was not yielded,
But conquer’d merely.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account