Moxon's mechanick exercises, volume 1 (of 2) : $b The doctrine of handy-works applied to the art of printingMoxon, Joseph
History
Moxon's mechanick exercises, volume 1 (of 2) : $b The doctrine of handy-works applied to the art of printing
Moxon, Joseph
Printing -- Early works to 1800
The many _Punches_ to be _Sunk_ into _Matrices_ for the same _Body_,
are difficult to be _Sunk_ of an equal depth. Therefore I always make
a _Beard-Gage_, as is described in _Plate_ 19 at F, where _a b_ is
a _Sholder_ that rests upon the _Face_ of the _Matrice_, _c_ is the
_Point_ or _Gage_ that measures the depth of the _Sunken Punch_. So
that when the _Point_ _c_ just touches the _Bottom_, and both the
_Sholders_ _a b_ the _Face_ of the _Matrice_, the _Punch_ may be
accounted well Sunk as to depth.
But though it be accounted well _Sunk_ for a first Essay, yet can it
not be reasonably imagined it is well _Sunk_ for good and all; as well
because in _Sinking_ the _Punches_ it has carryed some part of the
_Surface_ of the _Matrice_ down below the _Face_ of the _Matrice_ into
the _Body_ of the _Copper_, as because both the _Sides_ are doubtless
extorted, and one Side or Part of the _Punch Sunk_ more or less deeper
than the other. Wherefore I now come to
¶. 2. _Justifying the_ Matrices.
_Justifying_ of _Matrices_ is, 1. to make the _Face_ of the _Sunken_
Letter, lie an exact designed depth below the _Face_ of the _Matrice_,
and on all its sides equally deep from the _Face_ of the _Matrice_. 2.
It is to set or _Justifie_ the _Foot-line_ of the Letter exactly in
_Line_. 3. It is to _Justifie_ both the sides, _viz._ the Right and
left-sides of a _Matrice_ to an exact thickness.
Therefore to proceed Methodically, he first slightly Files down the
_Bunchings_ out that the _Punch_ made in the Sides of the _Matrice_;
And then slightly Files down all the _Copper_, on the _Face_ of the
_Matrice_, till the Hollow the _Punch_ made becomes even with the whole
_Face_ of the _Matrice_.
Then he _Casts_ a _Proof-Letter_ or two, and _Rubs_ them: And with the
Edge of a Knife cuts out what may remain in the bottom of the _Shanck_
by reason of the un-even breaking, off of the _Break_ that the square
bottom of the _Shanck_ may not be born off the _Bottom-Ledge_ of the
_Lining-Stick_.
But having till now said nothing of the _Lining-Stick_, it is proper
before I proceed, to give a Description of it: It is delineated in
_Plate_ 19 at G. Where G is the _Plain_, _a_ the _Side-Ledge_, _b_ the
_Bottom-Ledge_, _c_ the _Stilt_, all made of _Brass_.
The _Plain_ is exactly flat, Straight, and Smooth, that the _Shancks_
of the _Letter_ being likewise so, may lie flat and solidly on it.
Its depth between the _Bottom-Ledge_, and the fore edge is about the
length of the _Shanck_ of the Letter: But the whole _Plain_ of _Brass_
is yet deeper; Because the _Bottom-Ledge_ is fastned on it. The
_Lining-Stick_ is about two _Inches_ long for small Letters; but longer
for Big-_Bodyed_ _Letters_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account