Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
When the question of the Princess's dowry and annuity came up in the
House of Commons early in 1871, Parliamentary opposition to Royal grants
reared its head, and _Punch's_ summary of the debate is worth quoting:--
Mr. Gladstone, in a long speech, proposed, and Mr. Disraeli, with a
gesture, seconded the proposal for granting £30,000 as dowry to
Princess Louise, and £6,000 as H.R.H.'s annuity. There was loud
acclamation from all parts of the House, and when Mr. Peter Taylor
rose, hat in hand, to oppose the grant, the resolution had been
carried. Here it may be convenient to add that, at a later stage,
Mr. Taylor, rising amid groans from all sides, opposed the grant,
and Sir Robert Peel expressed regret that a Princess had, by the
advice of Ministers, been allowed to contract herself to the son of
a Minister. Mr. Disraeli, as might be expected, treated the matter
in a much more graceful way, paid a pleasant compliment to the
Marquis of Lorne, and was glad that a Princess had accepted a
Member of the House of Commons. Mr. Gladstone corrected Sir Robert,
saying that deviation from the established rule of Royal marriage
had been advised upon about eighteen months ago, and long before
the engagement to the Marquis. The division was the most amusing
which _Mr. Punch_ has ever chronicled. There were, for the grant,
350; against it, 1. This unit was Mr. Fawcett, but there were
really Three against the grant, namely, himself and two Tellers,
Sir Charles Dilke and Mr. Peter Taylor. The Commons roared lustily,
and the nation echoed the roar.
With a backing which though minute in numbers was strong in intellect,
it was not to be expected that this opposition would disappear. It was
again manifested over the grant to Prince Arthur in the same year, when
_Punch_ advised Sir Charles Dilke to renounce his title if he persisted
in his opposition to royalties, and in 1872 Shirley Brooks gives a
lively account of the debate on the proposed inquiry into the Civil List
on the night of March 19, when Mr. Gladstone treated Sir Charles Dilke
as Ulysses did Thersites:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account