Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 2 (of 4).—1857-1874
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
We never said, or meant to say, that things were as bad in the
Black Country now as they were fifty, forty, or twenty years ago.
We are quite ready to believe, with a more courteous and kindly
Black Country correspondent than Mr. Lawley, that much has been
done, and that much is doing, for religion, education and
civilization in that region as everywhere else.
* * * * *
If _Mr. Punch_ has been unfair to the Black Country, he has, at least,
been sinning in good company. Hear what Mr. Justice Keating spoke from
the Bench, in a Black Country case, not three weeks ago:--
"I cannot help noticing the most deplorable state of matters shown
by the evidence of these girls. We call ourselves a Christian
people and pride ourselves upon being a civilized nation. These two
girls have said that they could neither read nor write; that they
had never in their lives been at school, church or chapel; that
they had never heard of the Bible; and, as the learned counsel had
suggested, in all probability they had never heard of a Divine
Being. We send out missionaries to the heathen, but what avails all
this when we see such a state of things at home?"
The introduction of the Metalliferous Mines Bill in the Lords in July,
1872, prompted _Punch_ to express his ironic satisfaction:--
Would you be surprised to hear that we already protect women and
children to this extraordinary extent? No children under 15 are
sent down into the mines, and women are not worked more than twelve
hours, and--will you believe it?--not at all on Sundays.
In the same month the Lords read a second time the Bill for protecting
children against those who cruelly train them to become acrobats. There
is hardly a single mention throughout all these years of efforts to
secure humane treatment for working children in which the honoured name
of Lord Shaftesbury is not prominent, as it was in this debate. There
was, as _Punch_ says, no sentimentality about this interference, and we
ought not to leave children to be tortured for the delectation of the
lower class of folks, well-dressed or not, who are pleased by unnatural
acrobatic feats.
It gave _Punch_ no pleasure to write sermons on Blue Books, least of all
when the Blue Books only gave him the blues. He usually abstained from
the discussion of merely painful subjects. But just indignation often
forced him to make exceptions. Thirty years after the passage of the
first, and nine after the passage of the second Chimney Sweepers
Regulation Act, a very bad case of evasion occurred in the North of
England:--
We take this paragraph from the _Pall Mall Gazette_:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account