Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
Killing is no murder if complicated with treason. That renders it
a mere misdemeanour. A military offence, simply capital, becomes a
minor offence when treasonable besides. Treason is an extenuating
circumstance of mutiny and murder, and its commission in committing
those crimes reduces murderers and mutineers to political offenders.
Therefore, instead of being hanged or shot, they ought, if punished at
all, and not, on the contrary, rewarded, to be condemned to nothing
worse than temporary seclusion, and should, all of them, after a
merely nominal imprisonment, be respectfully released.
[Sidenote: _Obstruction and the Remedy_]
This was a logical and ironical _reductio ad absurdum_; yet _Punch_
lived to see it translated into practical politics forty years later.
In 1877 the scientific obstruction practised by the Irish Party in the
House of Commons prompted a whole series of cartoons. In one Parnell,
Biggar and Callan appear as "Erin's Three Graces." In another a drove
of Irish pigs (including Whalley) are shown blocking the railway line
of Parliament. In a third _Punch_ bids schoolmaster Northcote to take
down not the words, but something else of the obstructives. Commenting
on the twenty-six hours' sitting in July, 1877, in which the House was
held up by a group of obstructives that never rose above seven, _Punch_
observes:--
Four Chairmen--Raikes, Childers, Sir H. Selwin-Ibbetson, and W. H.
Smith--were used up in the night-watches, and the House was kept, by
relays, against the "Dauntless Three"--for Gray, Callan, Nolan and
Kirk are but recruits to the banner of Biggar, Parnell and O'Donnell,
the standard-bearers of Obstruction. All pretence of argument was
early abandoned; and it became a mere contest of endurance, varied
by episodes of more or less--generally less--lively squabbling and
chaff--if such a word may be used of anything that passes in the
august Temple of Legislation. All this while the new Standing Orders
seemed, by tacit consent, set aside; and Parnell, Biggar and O'Donnell
moved the Chairman out of the Chair, or report of progress, again and
again. And yet the Leader of the House had the rod of suspension in
his hand, though he forbore to use it, preferring the _reductio ad
absurdum_ of such a night's match between the toughness of the House
and the tenacity of its Obstructives. Once only he went so far as
to threaten more summary proceedings, on which, they say, O'Donnell
collapsed. Of course, the great O denies it.
But why, _Punch_ must again ask, allow debates to be degraded to
a farce, and the House to a bear-garden? Go to his Cartoon, ye
squeamish, and be wise. With the rod in the Speaker's hands, it is
not the Obstructives' _words_ that _Punch_ would have taken down. The
House sat from four o'clock on Tuesday till six on Wednesday.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account